Comments on: Top 5 differences between Diablo 2 and Diablo 3

By: phil

phil — Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:47:55 +0000

honestly… that game look to much like d2….. we had a great revolution between D1 and D2 but D3 doesnt seem to go far enough with the technologies of today. i was hoping a new gameplay. i WILL NOT BUY THAT GAME. same character ( to much like D2). they should call it D2-2 not D3.

By: Diablo Gamer

Diablo Gamer — Fri, 07 May 2010 10:14:20 +0000

This game looks like they are trying to make it too similar to World of Warcraft, which truly is a piece-of-shit game. Classes in World of Warcraft are far too much alike, so I’m glad they don’t want that same overlap in Diablo 3, but the bright colors and cartoon graphics need to go, as does the ridiculous looking “leet” armor. They should bring back the same classes and combat style as Diablo 2, just improve the graphics and add a new storyline. And this idea of needing 3 or 4 people to kill a boss is another one right out of the World of Warcraft playbook. If you can’t please solo gamers who don’t like playing online, then the game is worthless. That is the bottom line. Diablo has always and should always be a primarily single-player game but with a multi-player option.

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:22:45 +0000

Wow… to all those people saying its to light… Relax, its a work in progress.

>>>>>>>>>>>>(You can change contrast/darkness settings in the options menu btw… HAS ANYONE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT???????)<<<<<<<<<<<

Knowing blizzard, it will probably take another 3 years to come out anyway haha.. I also hope it isnt p2p; that would suck balls. Loved d1 and d2, im sure d3 wont disapoint.

By: Vampman

Vampman — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:05:43 +0000

Diablo = midevil/Gothic style Hack n’ slash. Its dark and demonic and thats what we love. Hell itself is being unleashed upon the earths. . Why should it be lite and colorful? I understand adding more color but it doesn’t need lightened, if anything make it more gruesome! and if the gods at blizzard can pull this game off(and they can) then there should be no need for pay to play! they will be swimming in money for the millions of copies sold.

~A True Diablo Fan

And the heavens shall tremble. .

By: Seth

Seth — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:38:45 +0000

Dear Diablo fans,
We have been awaiting this game for how many years? Blizzard is building more and more hype with this game. As I have seen in many interviews and videos of this game they aren’t trying to take away from diablo’s key elements, matter of fact there only building on them.From what I have seen they are making the game more effective in the gamers overall experience but improving co-op making a more indepth story line and adding better effects. Sure we will see some corks here and there with the lighting, besides the long wait has blizzard ever failed us?
I fore see D3 having some great new introduced elements that will help the classic players bond and remember the great qaulities that enlightend there every gaming sensation in the first. So my fellow D2 buds Cow it up and let the wait be worth it!

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:04:38 +0000

Any real diablo players knows the key to the game is its realism. If you add color and even to much color ur drawin attention away from game, we will be focused on the COLOR, instead of live action makin us feel like where in the game… for example most players heads will be stuck to screen meanin we are totally into it, it makes us feel like we are there…… YOU ADD COLORS OUR HEADS WILL BE AWAY FROM COMPUTER SCREEN LOOKIN AT EVERYTHIN BUT THE GAME…

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:38:57 +0000

i have to agree the colors make it look horrid trust me “WoW”. but one thing bugs me if they did away with the potion belt, and there are less monsters. when u have a team of people how would u heal and at the same time mf ? also when u get up to a boss then wat?

By: Chris C

Chris C — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:35:36 +0000

Ive played Diablo since its first release and Loved it, then Diablo 2 was great and I loved that.. it is a big controversy of the colors, but makeing the world dark isnt something of graphical scale.. but of “scenery” scale

You wouldnt expect a skeleton to rise when theres a sun out right? I mean even in Zelda 64 those f*ckers ran from the sun.

Color is good, in certain places.. but if the world is turning into hell.. then it best be fadeing quickly

Also.. eliminateing the hack -n – slash from this game just kills its roots, It was built upon that.. and gives it the feel “oh shit, no wonder why this town got raped” (Tristram in Diablo 2)

I mean come on, color has nothing to do about it.. REALISM does, and the world that circles around it

and using potions like mad is more realistic that touching a magical stone to replenish health

.. Potions were life lines, you best be prepared

Just seems like there making it baby proof or some shit

Blizzard, I really dont know whats up.. But ive played your games since the 90’s

Warcraft changing into a MMO was the biggest hit, as I was use to Strats.. , it was a nice concept

till the complete lore of the world was twisted around in a blender, because “certain” people would cry about “so and so” can do this or that

Balance is key aswell

I just sure hope D3 is what I expect it to be, I dont want another Dungeon Siege game.

~Chris C
-Gamer/Tech

By: THE MAIN DIFFERENCE

THE MAIN DIFFERENCE — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:02:53 +0000

The main difference is that it wont suck.

By: Fuck D2 Colors

Fuck D2 Colors — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:24:53 +0000

Wanting the same looking game as d2 is like saying lets go back to how pac-man looks. d2 looked like it did because computer graphics were about 5 years unadvanced. every game from now on will be more crisp and colorful because that means our cards our doiing our job