<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diablo 3 new art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/</link>
	<description>Diablo 3 News: Diablo 3 is official!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:18:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zion</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-10469</link>
		<dc:creator>zion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-10469</guid>
		<description>Detail certainly don&#039;t make everything on a picture.

I personally find the Blizz pic far more superior in character, style an attractiveness than the War one.

In a good picture, you have to vanish certain points and emphasize others so the eye can be guided to where you want it to look. So the picture lives, have focal, have atmosphere, the viewer varies between soft and rough, detailed and not, far and close, hot and cold etc.

The War pic have none of these. It doesn&#039;t even have a recognizable brush stroke, the &quot;mojo&quot;that would make the drawer recognizable from others. 

As everything is treated equally and with the most &quot;normalisation&quot; possible, the eye just files around, never attracted by something special.
The color palette is disgusting, and the traits are banal. And the monochromatic grey background... sorry, but no.

I&#039;m way more attracted to the Diablo art which have a lot of personality and dynamics, than the War one, which I find boring as my grandmother&#039;s carrot garden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detail certainly don&#8217;t make everything on a picture.</p>
<p>I personally find the Blizz pic far more superior in character, style an attractiveness than the War one.</p>
<p>In a good picture, you have to vanish certain points and emphasize others so the eye can be guided to where you want it to look. So the picture lives, have focal, have atmosphere, the viewer varies between soft and rough, detailed and not, far and close, hot and cold etc.</p>
<p>The War pic have none of these. It doesn&#8217;t even have a recognizable brush stroke, the &#8220;mojo&#8221;that would make the drawer recognizable from others. </p>
<p>As everything is treated equally and with the most &#8220;normalisation&#8221; possible, the eye just files around, never attracted by something special.<br />
The color palette is disgusting, and the traits are banal. And the monochromatic grey background&#8230; sorry, but no.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m way more attracted to the Diablo art which have a lot of personality and dynamics, than the War one, which I find boring as my grandmother&#8217;s carrot garden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantine</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-10322</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-10322</guid>
		<description>I agree Warhammmer has superior art and I find that not many players care unfortunately. I feel the art only makes the virtual experience more real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Warhammmer has superior art and I find that not many players care unfortunately. I feel the art only makes the virtual experience more real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unfolded.origami</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-10024</link>
		<dc:creator>unfolded.origami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-10024</guid>
		<description>Instead of making updates to insult people calling them fanboys, why not comment on the fact thar concept art is meant to be sketchy and actually refining concept art when it does not appear in the final product is just a complete waste of time?

Why demand more illustration artwork that adds nothing to the game itself instead of wanting the game released sooner?

I really cannot understand you. With lighter/darker graphics I can still see where you are comming from, although I still completely disagree, but it is a matter of taste I guess, but this post is just silly, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of making updates to insult people calling them fanboys, why not comment on the fact thar concept art is meant to be sketchy and actually refining concept art when it does not appear in the final product is just a complete waste of time?</p>
<p>Why demand more illustration artwork that adds nothing to the game itself instead of wanting the game released sooner?</p>
<p>I really cannot understand you. With lighter/darker graphics I can still see where you are comming from, although I still completely disagree, but it is a matter of taste I guess, but this post is just silly, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quetzi</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8770</link>
		<dc:creator>Quetzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-8770</guid>
		<description>penis.

Blizzard should make a contest for ppl to draw conceptions of characters and landscapes &gt;.&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>penis.</p>
<p>Blizzard should make a contest for ppl to draw conceptions of characters and landscapes &gt;.&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unfolded.origami</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8760</link>
		<dc:creator>unfolded.origami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-8760</guid>
		<description>Clearly there should be more &quot;art&quot; subjects in school. CONCEPT art is MEANT to be sketchy. To the Warhammer picture I would not even call concept art but rather an illustration.

The difference is concept art is used as a design direction and testing tool, and very useful at that, while illustration is a &quot;realistic&quot; representation of already defined objects, and a complete waste of time in what games are concerned. Why? Because this pictures never ever appear in-game, the detail, and the time needed to give it, is instead used up on the actual model you will be playing with.

It would seem you would like time wasted in making beautifully craftet drawings that have no purpose whatsoever, except feed your (our) fan hunger, which as much as I can relate to that, I would rather have the devs focused on actual game content and in finishing the game for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly there should be more &#8220;art&#8221; subjects in school. CONCEPT art is MEANT to be sketchy. To the Warhammer picture I would not even call concept art but rather an illustration.</p>
<p>The difference is concept art is used as a design direction and testing tool, and very useful at that, while illustration is a &#8220;realistic&#8221; representation of already defined objects, and a complete waste of time in what games are concerned. Why? Because this pictures never ever appear in-game, the detail, and the time needed to give it, is instead used up on the actual model you will be playing with.</p>
<p>It would seem you would like time wasted in making beautifully craftet drawings that have no purpose whatsoever, except feed your (our) fan hunger, which as much as I can relate to that, I would rather have the devs focused on actual game content and in finishing the game for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PloP</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8529</link>
		<dc:creator>PloP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-8529</guid>
		<description>Ghosts... that&#039;s what the brushstrokes mean... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ghosts&#8230; that&#8217;s what the brushstrokes mean&#8230; <img src='http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corrupted_leon</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8505</link>
		<dc:creator>corrupted_leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-8505</guid>
		<description>i think all of this diablo3 shit is just a bunch of crap.. i do not agree with how much it looks like WOW.. i think it is going to be a WOW replica.. after all WOW is one of the most played games out there so why not make a game resembling that to get more members?? all i know is that i am very disapointed in the way diablo3 is looking so far and i hope it gets better or i will not be wasting my money on it.. especially for pitiful artwork liek this..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think all of this diablo3 shit is just a bunch of crap.. i do not agree with how much it looks like WOW.. i think it is going to be a WOW replica.. after all WOW is one of the most played games out there so why not make a game resembling that to get more members?? all i know is that i am very disapointed in the way diablo3 is looking so far and i hope it gets better or i will not be wasting my money on it.. especially for pitiful artwork liek this..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klenx</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator>klenx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-8477</guid>
		<description>First of all, they can show whatever artwork they want. Secondly, as far as level of details are concerned there are many steps to the process of creating a character. Just because Warhammer only show &quot;final&quot; render doesn&#039;t necessarily mean the rougher artwork is any less conceptually in comparison. One could even argue Warhammer got too much unnecessary detail and boring silhouettes. It&#039;s a good piece to showcase, so they did.

Just to clarify things, a single concept artist will likely be responsible for hundreds of artwork that are on a demanding schedule. You would want to make the general idea clear first, before rendering anything. There&#039;s just no such time to render them all. Actually, the concept (whether it&#039;s based on a 3D model or not) is very close to the final barb in the game, which turned out great.

This is a respectable D3 site, these sort of post is really unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, they can show whatever artwork they want. Secondly, as far as level of details are concerned there are many steps to the process of creating a character. Just because Warhammer only show &#8220;final&#8221; render doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean the rougher artwork is any less conceptually in comparison. One could even argue Warhammer got too much unnecessary detail and boring silhouettes. It&#8217;s a good piece to showcase, so they did.</p>
<p>Just to clarify things, a single concept artist will likely be responsible for hundreds of artwork that are on a demanding schedule. You would want to make the general idea clear first, before rendering anything. There&#8217;s just no such time to render them all. Actually, the concept (whether it&#8217;s based on a 3D model or not) is very close to the final barb in the game, which turned out great.</p>
<p>This is a respectable D3 site, these sort of post is really unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diablo 3 new art &#124; Diablo 3 &#124; diablo3 Blogger News</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8456</link>
		<dc:creator>Diablo 3 new art &#124; Diablo 3 &#124; diablo3 Blogger News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-8456</guid>
		<description>[...] View post:Â  Diablo 3 new art &#124; Diablo 3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View post:Â  Diablo 3 new art | Diablo 3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eldiablodelanoche</title>
		<link>http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-new-art/comment-page-1/#comment-8455</link>
		<dc:creator>eldiablodelanoche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/?p=244#comment-8455</guid>
		<description>As I recall Blizzard didn&#039;t release the finer artwork for Diablo II until close to its release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall Blizzard didn&#8217;t release the finer artwork for Diablo II until close to its release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
