Diablo 3 characters

Get a Diablo 3 guest pass now!

Note: Diablo 3 guest passes allow 30 days of free gameplay.

Update (June 28): Diablo 3 has been announced at the WWI in Paris. You can now review the Diablo 3 trailer, screenshots, as well as demo.

Update: Blizzard has finally revealed ALL Diablo 3 characters:
Wizard | Witch Doctor | Demon Hunter | Barbarian | Monk
diablo 3 characters

I just looked at the stats for my Diablo 2 site. The two most popular characters on the site are the sorceress and the barbarian. Popular in the sense people are looking for specific skill guides and even saves.

I’m wondering which characters will make it to Diablo 3? A pure spell caster should be available, i.e. a sorceror or sorceress of some kind. Then, we need the classic sword – call him barbarian, gladiator, whatever. Blizzard has shown a knack for good (and balanced) mixed breeds – like the Druid or the Paladin.

Looking at the World of Warcraft characters, if Blizzard wants to turn Diablo 3 into a MMORPG they should put a healer of some sort as well. There’s none in the Diablo 2 universe.


225 Responses to “Diablo 3 characters”


  1. 1 MayhemStarterGTP Aug 29th, 2006 at 10:40 pm

    there is a healer in diablo 2 the paladin has holly bolt which can be made into a kick ass healer

  2. 2 Diablo Aug 30th, 2006 at 2:02 am

    you’re right! i just never played a paladin… seemed too much like a team character and i mostly played solo, so i played sorceress, barbarian, and necromancer.

  3. 3 Morbid_necro Sep 4th, 2006 at 4:35 am

    Why can’t you just say a date oh my god i am going crazy here i played the diablo’z and i loved em and i really wanna see the characterz. Oh well time to geek my barbarian Cya’z p.s TELL ME NOW!!!

  4. 4 Diablo Sep 4th, 2006 at 4:40 am

    All I can say that by E3 in 2007 we\’ll know more. My bet is Diablo 3 gets announced in 2007. Knowing Blizzard well, that doesn\’t mean we gonna play it in 2007. They\’ll probably take their time for another year :(

  5. 5 Blood.Stained.Angel Sep 6th, 2006 at 10:10 pm

    I really really REALLY!!! want to know all this info now! Why is Blizz doing this to us >.

  6. 6 Some Guy Sep 8th, 2006 at 1:30 am

    Diablo 2 was a huge disappointment for me. The first one was scary, nothing like walking down dark halls and such with spooky music playing as corpses littered the rooms and walls.

    Diablo 2 was…to close to an MMORPG…not enough of you being the hero and too much of you being a pawn for everybody else. What’s an MMORPG going to be like? Its NEVER worked for ANY game. They all get boring, they all get trite, they’re all basically the same game rehashed with a different backstory. I do NOT want to see Diablo in MMORPG form. EVER. In the first game it was all about the character and the plot, in the second game it seemed more about the wanderer than yourself. Sure, watching a story about him is pretty nifty cuz you wonder what happend to your character after the first game. But if I wanted to stay focused on mr warrior I would have kept playing the first game. That didn’t completely urk me. But the already-multiplayer Diablo will be a bloodstain in the gaming world that no necromancer will ever be able to wash. Imagine yourself a mighty warrior, who’s stride is proud, his blade wide, and the blood ablaze in his veins…then some jerk runs up screaming “LOLS FREE MONZ I NUB JUST STARTD PLyNG?!”

    Oh yeah …REAL heroic…I can’t wait………I’ve had a tried and true theory that as soon as a gaming community starts using the terms “Build” and “[insert boss name] run,” the game goes down the tube REAL fast in entertainment value. Whats the point to playing an MMORPG?! Do you really enjoy smacking millions of the same enemy day in and day out just for that one preset item drop it just simply refuses to drop? An endless game with zero replay value?

    Go here, retrieve this. Go there, kill that. And since its an endless MMORPG it doesn’t get an ending to it, it’s like reading a book but tearing out the last 5 chapters and BURNING them. Diablo was a big hit because it was totally focused on the world through the eyes of the hero you played as, it had a solid ending and even though it ended, it STILL HAS unlimited playing potential. And the game took forever to play no matter how many times you’ve beatin it which meant you wouldn’t do everything there was to do in the game in the span of 10 minutes. Something you CAN do in most MMORPGs.

    An MMORPG won’t be half the game Diablo II was, and Diablo II wasn’t even a quarter of the game Diablo I was. Take out the sex (ala succubus) the nightmare (ala bloodied carcasses, violent backstory, and horrible autrocities) and wierd twisted perversion of nature that was amply seen running rampant in the foulest pits of hell present in the first game and you’ve basically got something close to a saturday morning cartoon version of one of my favorite games in history. I spit on Diablo II, while the story was cool, they killed it with their plain/cliche character design and the unrelenting prospect that “Multiplayer is the wave of the futue! der der der.” Not enough time was spent enveloping the character in the realm of the diablo universe, it was too busy unwrapping plot points from the previous game than it was on opening up more venues of historical doom to explore. While they did quite a decent job (and by decent I mean excellent) making Diablo II fun to play, it was only worth playing it once through, after that you’re kind of done. Who wan’ts to run around in a brightly lit desert in extremely unsuitable clothing? “GASP …oh no… a highly visible angry mob of crap I can outrun…or run around. Uh…scary?” No. I bet if it wasn’t for the boss fights you wouldn’t have to kill a damned thing in the game. The monsters where simply there for you to level off of!!! BAD!!! In Diablo I they were the OBSTACLE. You had to make sure, you even took pride in making sure that every last skeleton on the level you were slowly pacing through was dead. In Diablo II the monsters simply respawned for you to kill over and over again. This means that you have to do a lot of needless grinding (oh look theres one of those words that ruin games that I was talking about earlier) just to kill of andarial. In Diablo I, By the time you met up with the Butcher or King Leoric, you were READY. They weren’t easy but it was possible to take them down using cunning, tactic, and what few scrolls you found in an obscure chest among a bunch of barrels that you’d hunt down like they were gods gift to mankind hoping that maybe one out of 20 of them had some gold in it. In Diablo II…well respawning monsters enough said, endless (pointless) economy. Diablo II multiplayer is already an MMORPG. You get bands of people together, trade items, grind, set up builds, and all that boring homework baggage that comes with complicating a decently good story with useless crap like Runes and waves upon waves of monsters that you kill like its your day job.

    And its only made worse from there! Why are you going to take out all the cool things in a game that give it some level of tactic, then slap on a patch that makes the game completely harder to play, THEN slap on a bunch of “Fixes” that change everything you knew about playing the game only to make your favorite tactics either pointless or impossible in favor of a more stupid but effective approach? A Piercing bow + Guided Arrow = Tactic. Whats the point of making something cool like that impossible to do if you’re just going to make a patch that makes some OTHER god-aweful-stupid build just as affective? The Necromancer, they made all of his curses basically useless (A WHOLE TREE, FOOF out the window!) Just to up a vastly more devastating poison nova? They deliberately ruined the piont to having iron maiden. At this point a few of you are probably going to devise some sort of useless defense about how it balances game play.

    WRONG

    Every class had some neato keen impressive trick that the game designers decided were to easily abused, in favor of buffing up easily spammable tactless skills. Necro’s had curses, Amazons had their Arrows, Barbarians had their whirlwinds, so on and so forth. “Hey I have an idea, lets get rid of the things that make each character unique in favor of a more balanced community?” I’ve got a better idea, how about we get rid of classes, and give everyone a class called “Person” with a bunch of really mundane skills that get progressively but not exponentially stronger so that they’re pointless to use when you’d be better off maxing a stat and bashing heads with a club…

    In Diablo I, the Warrior was the strongest, he smashed things up close, something the other two classes couldn’t do. The rogue had the advantage of long range something the warrior was near incapable of and the beginner mage couldn’t compete with. And the mage was a walking cannon in the upper levels. Strategy was abundant even though all you had were a bunch of walls doors grates and barrels. Tactic was a must because you couldn’t rush in and start killing waves of horrors like you can in Diablo II. What sense of mortality is Diablo II going to provide when all I have to do is focus every single skill point into Teeth and aim really far away? A wall of glowing light that pierces and kills everything doesn’t make me scared in the slightest to go up against the lord of terror. In Diablo one I can remember turning the lights on before entering the halls of the blind and it still didn’t help. A lonely warrior with no help, backup, or funky weapons of cheaty uber damage, walking slowly through a dungeon fighting foes he can’t see. Running isn’t an option when they move faster than you. You have to go slow, and pick them off well aware that you could die at any moment from an ambush of hidden.

    Another thing that urked me was the vastly changing atmospheres of Diablo II, I either didn’t get to spend enough time in the places I enjoyed or appreciated, or I spent to much time in a place I instantly loathed. The first game kept throwing things at you, it was something to find a room full of upside down burning crosses. Something so simple that could outclass all the stupidly useless baubles they have displayed at a desert vending shop. “Oh isn’t that pretty like I didn’t just see that a minute ago at the other shop.”

    WE DONT NEED AN MMORPG! WE ALREADY HAVE ONE AND ITS LAME! I give Diablo an A+, and I give Diablo II a B, (yes I know I just spent a hell of a lot of time dissing it but I’m just pointing out the terrible flaws, I’m sure I dont need to point out what makes the game fun because I’m sure all of you already know.) And I give any prospect at a massivly multiplayer online RPG (oh wait…Diablo II…its massively multiplayer…it goes online…and its a role playing game o.O would you look at that) an F for a failed attempt at keeping a franchise going that SHOULDN’T need cheap fads to keep itself alive. Its a decent enough story and I’d be more than happy with another Diablo I with its simple game mechanics, lack of fairness in different respects towards different classes, and a more than developed plot line with a solid ending.

    While Diablo II was a great game, it fell extremely short of everything I had come to expect of the masters who created the first, vastly more interesting, and far more terrifying Diablo. Simply because they fell into the Multiplayer trap. It takes away from the story and all the pointless patching to fix purely opinional “imbalances” in game play that were purposefully put in their to begin with to make playing each character class a unique experience with tactic and style. The game designers completely cater to the higher class players only, making it impossible for new comers to fully realize why those high class players enjoyed playing in the first place. Making a game balanced makes a game pointless to play.

    Diablo: Interestingly compelling story, 3 Stereotypical BUT uniquely portrayed characters, new visual eyecandy on every level, msyterious shrines, and a total sense that you weren’t playing a game. Spells where discovered in ancient tombs of knowledge, wisdom garnedered from little bits and stories from the townsfolk that you grew to love for their help, and an uncovering of the most powerful school of magery ever concieved who’s soul purpose in creation was to imprison the prime evils.

    Diablo II: Tying up loose ends to the previous story, 5 extremely cliche characters (save for the necromancer), all with an extremely broad sense of backstory, being nothing more than rehashed concepts from the previous 3 characters. The warrior was split into the barbarian and the paladin, the rogue was split up into an amazon and a sorceress, and the sorcerer was obliterated in usefulness. Now weapons were exclusive to classes. Spells where strictly built in. No more searching for those lost tombs of knowledge my friend, just kill 4958 hairy gorillas parading around out-of-habitat in a giant forest and get yourself a few perty burny spells out of no where. And a multiplayer base more concerned with getting an armor set than gathering up to kill the greatest threats of terror hatred and destruction the world has ever known.

    Diablo was more of a story than a game, it was enjoyable because if you got bored of the story (which you didn’t) you could kill things. If you found a sword and you had the strength, you could use the weapon. Just because you were a Warrior didn’t mean you couldn’t use the bow.

    Diablo II was the opposite. It was a killing game with a story around it instead of within it that was coupled with a whole bunch of features that made it seem more like a game than a story. You’ll never see a barbarian using a Katar…what? is his hand to fat for the handle or something? Bogus. It took all the mysticism out of gaining spells and using your latest toy against the denizens of the dead by setting all kinds of wierd requirements to them more akin to your latest rehashed mmorpg than any sort of lens for telling what I believe to be the greatest rendision of the struggle vs the Mighty forces of heaven, and the swirling vortex’s of chaos known all to well in the foul pits of hell. In the first game you were literally killing the stuff of nightmares. In the second game you were killing mutated animals. In the first game you had a feeling about you that every stone every rock every cross every corpse had some hidden story to tell. Every different kind of demon you stopped and paused and thought to yourself “I wonder how that horrible twisted breathing cadaver came into being” And chances are the game told you where it came from and why.

    Overlords where the warped servants of an angel clouded by pride captured and tortured by the lord of hatred himself, who’s glowing skin and elegant wings where torn and stretched by barbed hooks and who’s body was warped by the very magics that made the realm of hell.

    Tell me, what explains a god damned yetti?!?!

    If they can make an MMORPG in such a way where I will never see the word “Grind” on or off the playing field, one that gets me so indepth I not only know why the monsters are there, I know how they came into BEING in the first place, then maybe, just maybe I might not grimace at the thought of any franchise going mutliplayer-global.

    Seeing as how Diablo II is already a massively multiplayer online (hardly-)roleplaying game, anything they come up with would be nothing more than a rehashed (such a handy word) Diablo II. Nothing in this world will make me look forward to a community full of high powered gamers who treat everyone else like targets, and a bunch of low level total-noobs(once again if you have to use the word noob in a game, it has already failed) do nothing but annoy you and ruin the atmosphere until you give them what they want or find something else to do other than sit in the middle of town talking to your friends because you’ve already played the game a million times and have nothing better to do with your glowing single handed meter long glowing death sword of blight pain and misery.

  7. 7 Some Guy Sep 8th, 2006 at 1:32 am

    Yes it absolutely had to be this long…

  8. 8 Diablo Sep 8th, 2006 at 9:16 am

    Guy, you nailed it. I still remember running around for N-ieth time around the Butcher in Diablo. That bastard was tougher than nails. The atmosphere was pure horror as well.

    I hope there are still guys at Blizzard who’d like to work on a hardcore game like Diablo.

  9. 9 lol Sep 9th, 2006 at 4:28 am

    lol

  10. 10 Diablo Sep 10th, 2006 at 2:02 am

    Just to address one thing about guy\’s post – I don\’t thing Diablo 2 was a MMORPG just because it provided a multiplayer option. MMORPGs have a persistent universe. Any instance of a Diablo 2 game was like the instances in World of Warcraft. You go in, you kill, you beam out.

  11. 11 Lunar6000 Sep 20th, 2006 at 10:56 am

    Guy you dont know what your talking about in my opinion. Diablo 2 and its expansion were amazing A+ mayne, I spent 3 years of my life on that game.

    Also the paladin and all the other characters where good and I think they should just leave them alone and maybe add some more.

  12. 12 Valitiney Sep 24th, 2006 at 1:57 am

    SOME GUY NO NO NICE!!!!!I SICK GIZMO ON YOU…………………..GOOD BOY

  13. 13 Some Guy Sep 28th, 2006 at 8:41 am

    OMG THEY DIDN”T DELETE MY POST ITS A MIRACLE O_O

    Gizmo’s mean T-T

  14. 14 Some Guy Sep 28th, 2006 at 9:05 am

    I’d be happier to see a novel using a video game as a lens, rather than a video game with a story. I can’t get over how good Diablo was, and I never said I hated Diablo II, but I DO know what I’m talking about.

    Yes the new characters where fun to play, as for leaving them alone, the game designers didn’t. They messed with them to the point where you couldn’t do anything cool with them anymore. I go back to citing Piercing arrow + guided arrow. Why would they get rid of that?

    I’m still waiting for an MMORPG that can do it right. I want a story that never gets old, not a game that never ends. I just hope the guys at blizzard remember what made the first game so awesome. I’m impressed by quality not quantity. I want the horror back in the game, I want the fear, the torment, I want to run SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER down dark hallways where unspeakable monstrocities feast upon the corpses of my fallen comrades back in the game. I want this game to be the unbrittled cold-sweat-midnight even Diablo couldn’t muster. Nightmares man, NIGHTMARES.

    I want this MMORPG to be the greatest horror game ever concieved. I want a game I can’t play in one sitting simply because I have to turn the thing off before I go psychotic. A cult classic (if there was ever a better term to describe Diablo) to rock the ages. I want this game to be more concerned with making you feel like you’re a blip in the cosmic clashing forces, more concerned with wrapping you in the story, more concerned with day to day life living on a continent who’s fate is baubled between the fingers of the living embodiement of everything mortal man wasn’t meant to know. Dialbo, the Lord of Terror.

  15. 15 Paladin_01 Oct 7th, 2006 at 9:53 am

    their will be any changes on characters and gameplay? so can you tell me… i am too eager to kick diablo’s asses…..

  16. 16 KaneIsAlive Oct 10th, 2006 at 7:51 pm

    Hey Some Guy, I agree with your opening paragraph but that’s all I read because it’s entirely too long. I am longing for the feeling i got when I first played Diablo in the dark with the volume high. Twas’ indeed frighting.
    \
    I think the Blizz knows how anticipation pays off in the end- because when it comes, were gonna be like YEEEEES! IT”S FINALLY HERE.
    After all, what’s the sex with out the foreplay?

  17. 17 S15drifter0719 Oct 11th, 2006 at 2:47 pm

    i think what would make the characters better would be if u could choose the gender…like male and female barb and all…thats almost all the game is really missing…and it would be sweet if u could customize the charaters a lil more…like facial wise and maybe a few tattoos or something

  18. 18 WojO Oct 20th, 2006 at 7:56 pm

    OK some guy u are anoyying first of all and the gender dont really matter to me…
    wut i was just talking about to my friend was maybe we could use 2-3 mercs and not just one, that would be cool but could also add alittle more lag.
    and y put tattoos or somthing on a char is u cant see them? kinda weird

    wut would be cool is maybe add more skills or more things u can add to and maybe even a higher lvl
    i got addicted and played diablo 2 lod for about 2 years and its fun
    but just gets boring somtimes
    my point is that it needs somthing BIG that will excite anyone and everyone anywere and everywere
    idk it sounded cool so i added it ;)
    thats my opinion and WojO oUt

  19. 19 James Wolfrey Oct 25th, 2006 at 6:44 pm

    Dude. If your going to make a Diablo 3 you need to give people a choice on what color and gender they want on all of your characters.
    But hay, sweet. Hope it comes out soon

  20. 20 Diablo Oct 26th, 2006 at 4:06 am

    James, I think you\’re right – customization of the character is key. Check out Hellgate London – they\’re doing some pretty good customizations in terms of color schemes, different types of armors combining to create a unique look.

  21. 21 Some Guy Oct 26th, 2006 at 5:28 am

    Well I dont personally care if I’m annoying. Who ever you are with your extremely short and pointless post. Dont lash out at creative insight when the most you can come up with is “more skills.” Innovative! Brilliant! More skills…no. Why dont you actually try making an arguement like Diablo did?

    I found his post informative. Gizmo at least bit me.

    Customization for a Porg Is practically manditory. If Diablo 3 is going to be anything like any other Porg out there its most definitly going to have gender choice. I doubt that’s going to be a key defining feature of the game though. I’m almost cringing at what they might do with the universe if they’re heading in the non-horror direction similar to Diablo 2.

    I’m not saying Diablo 2 sucked at all. It was fun to play on its own (which is how games should be played), but if you pair it up to Diablo, it was just a big let down in the horror department, this being my own opinion that I dont expect anyone to share with me. Diablo – Lord of Terror – Terrifying game. I’d assume they could have at least changed the title to Baal – Lord of Destruction.

    Sure, Hell looked cooler, and….more hellish…it just wasn’t scary though.

    I’m really hoping this turns out to be a Porg with strong horror elements and none of that “Can you collect 20 chicken eggs for me? I’ll give you this enchanted frying pan iff’n ja do” crud. I could play Ragnarok, Guildwars or runescape for that. I once had a conversation with a sad fellow who couldn’t come to grips that you can have a Porg without these stupid insigificant quests. I’m not sure how you guys will handle this, but in other Porg communities they bite your head off when you come up with crazy notions like a game without grinding.

    If they make a Porg its got to include a whole bunch of elements I couldn’t get from any other game. What this USUALLY means however is some sort of complicated trivial game mechanic that doesn’t do anything for actual gameplay besides extend the amount of time before you actually start having fun.

    Another thing to note is story line. In Diablo, after you cleaned out the demon nest in the water cavern, that was it. No more demons there. In Porgs, you can go in there a million times and kill everything, even after the quest was completed. I find this ruins the mood and feel of the accomplishment…wow…I killed all the demons…again.

    Here’s a question for the community. Would it change Diablo’s appeal if it was in an over the shoulder first person view?

    I actually think I like this community. my mega post was taken in good stride and people actually had things to say other than “OMFG NOOB GTFO KTHXBAI” I still think Gizmo is ebil…ebil wid a B o_O

    And Kane I encourage you to finish reading my post. :D It may have some items of interest you may or may not agree with. Aside from that, my friends thought it was an interesting read before they foudn out I wrote it. >:D

    Even though a few of them are hopelessly lost on the fact that grinding isn’t fun…a thought I cringe upon. Oh how I hope to the gaming gods diablo doesn’t have a farmer’s quest >.

  22. 22 The Face Oct 26th, 2006 at 5:49 am

    Indeed

  23. 23 The Face Oct 26th, 2006 at 5:54 am

    But if someone try’s to make a Male Amazon then i’ve lost hope for this and every other game out there. i say we let them have there genders, but leave out the gender specific ones. IE the Amazons, and probably anything else that strikes the fancy of the Hermaphro-players out there. i just hope to got that all the females in the game arent wearing metal bikini’s. test my metal but not my crotchplate. force people to play a game instead of a cheap peep show.

  24. 24 Diablo Oct 26th, 2006 at 9:12 am

    I played a dwarf (hunter) in WoW and I couldn’t IMAGINE myself being a female. Female dwarfs suck (no pun intended).

    However, I did see one female dwarf (somewhere in Ashara) and it didn’t look THAT bad. So although I’ll never make the same choice myself, others did it.

    For the life of me, I could never be a Night Elf male either.

  25. 25 CONFIRMED Oct 27th, 2006 at 10:33 pm

    2007 it is!

  26. 26 bob Oct 28th, 2006 at 4:56 pm

    some guy u suck balls u type too much fucker

  27. 27 Kevin Oct 28th, 2006 at 7:08 pm

    I hope they make a new ninja,thats way better then the last one on the expansion.i think it would also be cool to have a final fantasy style team option also.

  28. 28 Kevin Oct 28th, 2006 at 7:11 pm

    being able to customize the gender and looks would be cool

  29. 29 Dym Oct 29th, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    I just had to say this … Some Guy you are the man ! You have saved me a lot of writting (and staring at dictionary because my english sucks). Diablo 1 had(has) enormous amounts of potenial (climate). All monsters were diffrent had their habits tactics story! (oh I can remember the frightening battle against The Butcher in demo version this was like whole campaning to kill this beast. The fear before opening those doors a shock after hearing his taunt even already knowing what is going to happen and being well preapared had some powerfull scrolls bought from this greedy witch Adria couldnt slow down my heartbeat and decrease the thirll. And it was only the begining) in diablo 2 I dont really even think about what Im killing just look at immunites (unless I dont play hammer then I just click the button). Ill stop comparing here because most of things were written by Some Guy earlier (I just had to write atleast one thing) and this isnt really place to talk about what is missing in diablo 2 but what we would like to see in diablo 3 (precisely characters).
    For me there should be fraction/character system implemented (after destruction of Worldstone wich supposed to be created by “tutelary” ;) angels to limit humans powers so they wont be tempted by the “dark side”. Humans will be more powerfull but more capable to become evil ones) but please save me things like oh you are other fraction so I cant talk/trade with you and in addition I automatically hate you and of course the most stupid thing wich is apearing in most mmorpgs fraction should be something that you chose/gain by your actions/decisions not by clicking proper option at character creation screen or by killing loads of somehow bad/good monsters (yeah Im paladin of light so what if I spend all day long grinding pigs and backstabing weakened players or from the other hand fear me Im dark lord of primal evil Ive killed 666 good faeries!) and it is your bussines to wich (if any) purpose you serve and people shouldnt know that you are bad because you have red instead of blue name. There should be at last 3 fractions “good”(those bigotrgic angels) “evil” (vilians but for me good and evil in most stories is only predetermined point of view) and neutral (sober-minded people not some fanatics) there can be ofcourse some fallen angels rebelious demons etc.
    I think all d2 characters would do (but Im missing good old warrior not some stupid barbariand or blockheaded paladin) there can be new ones like for instance demonologist (Summon/enslave demons! Use fearsome destructive spells wich will annihilate your foes ! Adopt demonic powers and shape your body into frightening manifestation of infernal power flowing within your veins and soul (If you still have one) ! yeah I know you wanna pre-order already :P) of course demonologists shouldnt have to be evil from the begining but will have to watch out to not become one of the beasts with wich they are fighting (as every class).
    There is a lot of other things that I would like to say but unfortunately I/you dont have all day long to write/read all of this.

  30. 30 Some bigger guy who wants to kick ure ass Oct 30th, 2006 at 7:09 am

    ZzZzZz, this noob forum has bored me, ZzZzZz

  31. 31 Some Girl Oct 31st, 2006 at 4:46 pm

    I actually think that Diablo II was better than the first. For me, anyways. I found that I could play it more often than the first. There weren’t as many creatures in the original than in the 2nd, which totally fucked up my levelling. Plus, I figured since I beat it once already (which took me two solid days) that I didn’t need to play it again.

    I just like D2 better because you can actually RUN. Walking around is time consuming, and pisses me off. Sometimes I like life better in the fast lane…

  32. 32 happychap Nov 13th, 2006 at 10:00 am

    diablo 2 pwns all and i give it A+ all the way . yes diablo 1 was good especially with the butcher at start where he is as hard as fightin uber dia in d2 at lvl 40 or sumthin. btw anyone wantin a duel on d2 europe ladder or nl and needs some competition just msg me acc is happychap =P

  33. 33 happychap Nov 13th, 2006 at 10:01 am

    and another thing that i didnt liek about the 1st dia .. you had to walk… -.- but in d2 you can run which makes things easier and quicker.

  34. 34 Flargatron Nov 13th, 2006 at 8:45 pm

    howdy peeps. i agree with kevin. it would kick ass to have customizable character. also if they keep the cow lvl but changed it per difficulty lvl like to satanic bunnies or something that would be the shit!!! if they could make character lvls infinite and bring in your old character like blizzard did for Champions Return to Arms.

  35. 35 roger Nov 14th, 2006 at 1:21 am

    Diablo 2 was far superior
    the replay value was amazing, with the amazing diversity between each class
    also the items is what makes diablo 2 such a fantastic game, no character is the same, as they all have different equipment, at leas thats what i have found playing single player

  36. 36 forrest Nov 14th, 2006 at 10:33 pm

    Hey hey i think that WOW is kinda dull compared to D3 well they bolth match in rating to me, :) i think that WOW should have more lvls like up to 99 lvls or upto 99+ lvls… :) :) Yeah that what i think…. If u dont like my Reply then reply to me then i hope il get to u soon :) :) :) :)

    -|BcA|-Stalker

    Thats my CS:S name : CS:S = Counter Strike Source

  37. 37 forrest Nov 14th, 2006 at 10:34 pm

    LOL :( :) :) :( :( :) :P :D

  38. 38 Mojo Nov 15th, 2006 at 11:22 am

    WOW is pretty good, I dont know about Diablo 3!!!!!!!!!

  39. 39 Mojo Nov 15th, 2006 at 11:23 am

    what the hell, diablo 3 is good, if the second was good this one is good to

  40. 40 Jonny K. Nov 17th, 2006 at 3:21 am

    some guy true statments dog but d2 is a+ too man. Sure it has flaws but doesn’t d1? example: d2: rushing wreks the game; like some noob getting lvled by a lvl 99, d1: cloneing wrecks the game why the f did blizz alow cloning for so many patches? d2: game more about trading than killing monsters d1: too much walking; half the time u walking than killin some monsters, d2: alot of gay unused spells (only used by noobs), d1: only one set of spells that all 3 chars hav to share. i can write more but i cant b fuked. IF D3 = MMO THEN JONNY K=EMO plz blizz dont turn d3 mmo your ull be responsible for my wrists

  41. 41 ya momma Nov 23rd, 2006 at 9:26 pm

    Diablo 2 is by far the most kick ass game i have ever played in my life and i cant wait till they make a diablo 3 and actually put it on the shelves because im gonna steal all the money from my friends and parents and girlfriend and get it……YA MOMMAS

  42. 42 hueb Nov 28th, 2006 at 9:22 pm

    sup when u going to tell the date omg lol and i realy wont to see the chars!!! plz msg lol i realy wont to no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  43. 43 mutapenko Dec 6th, 2006 at 12:06 am

    In terms of characters, it may sound awful, can there be a pure summoner, healer as always said (less likely), a pure caster nor even anything said out there, but can there be also a pure melee where it cannot use bow, not a pure range that cannot use melee weapons?

    with all the discussion about characters, is there a way to have new weapons too? i mean like a weapon that is not too close range and not too long range? the pikes and scythes and others are long but the distance is compared to swords.

    How about the new event that appeared for diablo2? it was nice too and needed to say that the challenge is good.

    Another is about those Assistants called HIRELINGS at each town, that is good and acceptable. Is there a new Hirelings like monsters that level up too?

    But having all that rucus, can you fix the character editor? i mean having an editor to showoff is cool but would it be better for having limited playing source like it can only be played at single player and cannot be used in multiplayer?

    But with all these It is nice to add diablo3 to followup that last movie when BAAL take his soulstone.

    AN ON TOP OF ALL. . . DAMN YOU!!! Hahaha this is a great game!

  44. 44 Christian Dec 6th, 2006 at 9:15 am

    well one problem the guys that created diablo they have left blizzard and started ther on game studio flagship and they are going to reales hellgate london and i hope that blizzard dont influens to mutch from wow now..

  45. 45 Jay Nimble Dec 6th, 2006 at 9:43 pm

    The gladiator sound good. Good combat skill and melee finess sounds. Sounds better than the warrior or barbarian. Could look more like a roman soildier. There should be more than one warrior than can dual wield weapons though. Maybee a ranged specialist that can change two wield two weak but fast knives or shortswords. Thankyou.

  46. 46 Ben dover Dec 11th, 2006 at 5:49 am

    D3 better be free on the net , not like wow.

  47. 47 yooyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoy Dec 12th, 2006 at 1:30 am

    i so hope there will be new chars in d3 i am tyred of the same old chars like trolls or some thing in that gen areaor maybe dragons? that would be sweet vampires or some thing o man i can go on for days lol so i leave it at that

  48. 48 Kevin Jurnet Dec 12th, 2006 at 8:03 pm

    What I would like to see is both the Diablo one and two characters brought back with custom options that would really make the game really bad ass. Just a matter of opinion. Now I’m going back on D1 and go kill Diablo with my sorcerer, then my rogue, and then my warrior. I do enjoy the second one but, still, I have say that D1 is the best one. You just can never beat the first of a series. Yes there will be more selections and higher quality but it’s the original that started it all. You all can say what you want about my statement, I don’t care.

  49. 49 Some Guy 2 Dec 17th, 2006 at 8:18 pm

    I completely agree with guy

    In D2 i spent most of my time in one dungeon the monsters over and over just to go up a level to face a boss.

    But in D1 you couldn’t do that. You had to fight your way through the dungeon (without some high level guy every monster in sight and calling you noob) and when you get to the end and have to face something as frightening as the butcher, you werent already level 20 with some fancy armor and weapons. you had a sword and a brain. And you had to use them well.

    Even though my post isnt as long as Guys, id like to say that they can go ahead and make D3 a mmo (face it, D2 is an mmo). But they could also make D3 just like D1. indepth story, horrifying. But they and combine it with D2 by giving you a choice to go online. And in single player, you cant grind but you can grind all you want online. That would have me right away.

  50. 50 ya mum Dec 29th, 2006 at 3:11 am

    i liked diablo 1 and i luved diablo2 but i hope its more like diablo 2

  51. 51 OMG Dec 29th, 2006 at 4:12 am

    Hmmm, I think that a few of you should try playing the first one again (including the Hellfire expansion) and realize that you need to pull your heads out of your asses. It was a great game for its time and paved the road for D2 and similar games, and thats where the point can end. It was also slow and narrow minded in comparison to D2. Oh, by the way, it was also multiplayer, which several of you seem to have forgotten (yes, I’m talking to the essay winners above.) D1 also had some of those annoying or “grinding” little “side quests” that you had to complete to get ahead (like better armor and such.) D2 gave us more of everything, some good some not as good, and I’m sure that D3 will give us even more. So do everyone a small favor and allow yourself to breath some fresh air, and maybe give it a chance before you continue to pick it apart.

    Sorry no witty quip to end the rant.

  52. 52 JC Dec 31st, 2006 at 9:09 pm

    Sorry in advance but i didnt have enough time to read this whole forum because it was new year’s day and my girlfriend was asking me to stop reading it :P

    I agree with some guy’s views on D1 and D2 especially in terms of tactics, but D2 has its merits too.. especially in that the merchants save your skin at the start (if you dont multiplay), but really the story was awful.
    As for Online gaming.. it can be pretty good if you dont abuse it.. I played D1, D2, Guildwars and WoW.. and you just have to take each as a different thing.. but WoW i found to be seriously lacking… actually I’ve recently been playing Elder Scrolls 4 and I’d quite like to see an online RPG like that…except where there is no system whereby the game sets the difficulty of random encounters to be vanquishable by someone of your level.. random encoutners should be random.. even if it means you have to run for your life screaming like a sissy and hoping they pick on someone else while you hide behind a rock thinking about how you are going to get away from this alive…
    I dont want a no brain game..
    as for the classes and the gender deciscions you can have certain mutual classes and things like that but what about a system where you actually have to do something to merit being the class that you want…
    join a school of magic and a school of war to be a fighter/mage blend.. etc… but i still think that finding tomes and being taught stuff is a better than inatley knowing that these are hte skills that you will have.. wouldnt it be much more fun knowing that you could find (1/1000 chance) a tome of kill everything (lame name but it reflects the ability) but would only achieve spell level 1 by the time some other guy had found 20 tomes of bad breath (1/50 chance) which would balance things out… not that im an advocate of balancing things.. but i am an advocate of the choices we make making each of us different.. and what i would love to see is everyone starting as a joe (or janet) bloggs (doe) and starting with pretty much the same starting abilities.. a bit like in gothic 2… anyways thats my thought.. like it or lump it.. but i think the time to balance is at the start of the game.. not at the end.. thats just plain stupid..
    good players are better than bad ones.. let the choices they make reflect that
    i look forward to D3 but i won’t be surprised if it isnt what i expected..
    i just hope that it challenges me mentally

    sun tzu said: good warriors prepare for victory then go to war, poor warriors go to war then seek victory

  53. 53 :) Dec 31st, 2006 at 10:24 pm

    Who cares about making your own chars just make higher levels new classes new spells new monsters harder bosses and its a hit for me.

  54. 54 Mike Hunt Jan 1st, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    I think that Guy 1 is right. But i have an interesting side of the story, I played diablo 2 first, but when i got bored i started playing diablo 1 and got very addicted. I think if they combined both games together we would end up with a great diablo 3 (in my opinion). If they took the runes, crafting RUNNING, trading, lvling, and grinding side quests. And they combined it with the in-depth story, and the ever class can use all the weapons and the cunning and thrilling action and horror of the first diablo. I think if they did that, that diablo 3 would be the greatest game ever to be published by blizzard and would be loved by all kinds of gamers.

    Thanks,

    Mike Hunt

  55. 55 uhhhhhh Jan 1st, 2007 at 11:08 pm

    dude i hope they dont make it an mmorpg. well at least not like wOw where you have to pay 15 bucks a month.

  56. 56 Wilo Jan 4th, 2007 at 5:01 pm

    Some guy i soooo go wiht ur idea, it will be more exciting if the game was more frightening not just running around killing dudes doe no reason…i want the game to give me a scare i mean diablo 2 is great but findin and learnin the skills is more realilistic other than havin magically apeear i mean wtf? id he just find a invisible note or sumtin?? Altought i never played diablo 1 it does sound like a awsome game….

  57. 57 Wilo Jan 4th, 2007 at 5:08 pm

    o also hate how when u finish a quest in d2 u can do it again..i mean like if u got assigned that quest why the f do u gotta do it again the towns people say “thank for killin blood raven” but when u go back WTF SHES THERE heh that really got to me…

  58. 58 winner Jan 6th, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    DIABLO 3! i cant w8!!!! and all people shall know : diablo1 ROCKS! Diablo2 ROCKS EVEN MORRE!!!!! every1 hu disagrees shall shut up or grow up or kill him/herself!

  59. 59 winner Jan 6th, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    DIABLO 3! i cant w8!!!! and all people shall know : diablo1 ROCKS! Diablo2 ROCKS EVEN MORRE!!!!! every1 hu disagrees shall shut up or grow up or kill him/herself!
    about d3… i they make it like 20 chars some pure some mixed and LOOOTS of weapons and armor and make that u kan have like 5 mercenaries. they also need to add lots of stuff like:
    make it so u can buy good stuff in stores. coz i mean there is no use of having bunch of money if only way u can buy good items is gambling.
    they have to make that u can wear like 2 or more amulets or rings and that kind of stuff. i mean really chars have 10 fingers so why wear only 2 rings?
    they also need to make it like that u can be infinetly high lvl, because it sucks that u cant go higher then 99.
    they need to make that u can MAKE stuff like brew health potions or enchant white stuff to blue. it just sucks that u can only kill monstrs or buy for stuff like that
    they DONT need to make it 3d grafics are alrready good and theyr 3d SUCKS!
    there is also bunch of things that they need to do but i m 2 lazy to list them all so TELL ME WHEN ITS RELEASED OMG OMG OMG I CAN WAIT!

  60. 60 JY Jan 8th, 2007 at 10:58 am

    i cant wait for diablo 3!!
    there better be a sorceress in there or srew the whole fuckin game
    ^^

  61. 61 peter Jan 8th, 2007 at 12:12 pm

    when is it comeing out?man plzzz some1 tell me!!!!!!!!!!!:(

  62. 62 some guy's advocate Jan 9th, 2007 at 2:53 am

    all hail some guy

  63. 63 some guy's advocate Jan 9th, 2007 at 2:53 am

    all hail some guy

  64. 64 some guy's stalker Jan 11th, 2007 at 12:44 am

    some guy should recieve a kik to the balls by every 1 that has to read his on and on crap!!!

  65. 65 some guy's stalker Jan 11th, 2007 at 12:44 am

    some guy should recieve a kik to the balls by every 1 that has to read his on and on crap!!!

  66. 66 coqwert Jan 11th, 2007 at 10:00 am

    d2 will be bored easier than d1, story boring and damn huge map,except cool item , but wat use if cool item that can hack ur way through the gm since u can easilly kill everyone.

    hope d3 increase in game pace n mysterious.
    i dont hope that all quest can be solve by walkthrough , its better by obtaining tips through game.(everytimes the quest is random generated.)

    english bad lol

  67. 67 DIABLO the MOVIE Jan 11th, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    I generally agree with Some guy’s assessment of Diablo 1 and 2. Diablo 1 offered a more complete and memorable gaming experience than Diablo 2. Diablo 2 was an excellent game for sure and I enjoyed playing it a lot. But the first Diablo was a whole lot scarier, the plot was superior to Diablo 2, and the gameplay was such that once you begin playing the hero character you didn’t want to stop until you finally finish off Diablo. Diablo was totally addictive.

  68. 68 milo hill Jan 12th, 2007 at 3:52 am

    this is cool

  69. 69 Jak Jan 12th, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    what about, everybody starts as a “person” and becomes a class! the more clubbing and beating they do makes them a barbarian or whatever shade of grey you’d like the more throwing things at pplz, the more dealings with undead whatver, it should shape your character into a class, not be predetermined

  70. 70 winner Jan 14th, 2007 at 11:20 am

    by the way, dont make it a MMO coz it would suck and if they would make you pay to play SCREWTHEM, HTEIR MOMMAS AND THE GAME! and some gAy, you shall kill yourself coz u r a dumb piece of shit all diablos rock and if u, mother something, disagree, i would make u suck your own balls and bite something off and then torture u .

  71. 71 Eric Kyle Jan 15th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    i LIKE # 1 AND 2.#1 is somewhat cool.I remember when i thought it had good graphics.LOL.I also thought it was annoying every time you clicked on griswald he says Weaw what can i do for you .I now what you can do for me Griswald.SHOVE A SWORD UP YOUR FAT ASS.I thought it sucked that all of #1 was just one dungeon.When I watched my friend play #2 I thought it was the coolest game in the world.LOL.My other friend bought the game and coppied it for me.YAY.My computer at the time was a windows 98.LAGGED ALL THE TIME!!!!!!!!!!!.Thank god it crashed.I just got a new dell for christmas2006.Im wating do buy the game 4 myself in the box.But then again ive been playing this game at my friends house and is starting to suck ass.Then I heard theyre making #3!!!!.YAY.YEAH RIGHT.After I beat the game ill play another character and beat it again.play battle net with #3.Download #3hero editor after I get bored outta my ass.By then Ill be 16 and have a job and be to buisy with makin big dough.by then #4 will be coming out.Yay just another game with the same story line.Ill probably still buy it.Do you people realize how long ago they made #1 .10 YEARS!!!!!!What makes you think theyll be coming out with#3 within a few months you impatient bastards.#2 used to be really cool like the sound effect when you travel to a waypoint.Or the quest you had but didnt know what they were.Or the towns that were there but didnt explore them all.When #3 comes out youll all be playin it all the time and be bored with it then start talkin shit about#2 then be watin for#4 after a few months.By the way Did you read this far??HAHA!!!!!Read my post

  72. 72 Eric Kyle Jan 15th, 2007 at 6:52 pm

    I heard the ceo of blizzard say there is gonna be 3 new releases in 2007.Im guessing Starcraft 2,wow expansion,And D3

  73. 73 Diablo Freek Jan 16th, 2007 at 11:20 am

    Hmmm… I really hope D3 will come out, but from what i heard blizz North Closed, kinda hard for D3 to surface tho. Anyway why isn’t anyone talkin about tyrael lol. There are plenty of rumours that if D3 were to come he would be the main villian along with the 2 Yet-To-Be-Seen lesser evils, Azmodan and Belial.

  74. 74 booo is ter Jan 18th, 2007 at 3:10 am

    I remember when i first entered the dungeon in diablo 1, and after some minuites i died because of these scary skeletons. i couldn’t sleep after that. it was so traumatizing. and the music of diablo 1 kept on playing in mind. i was so scared that when i played it again my hands were as cold as ice. and the butcher..the butcher!!!

    diablo 2 is not as scary as diablo 1 but the character skills are cool.

    i just hope that diablo 3 is as scary as diablo 1.

  75. 75 Guild wars LOVA Jan 20th, 2007 at 12:42 am

    Lol it aint that scary my friend has it and i created a necro. I havent played online really. If they make a Diablo like wow they should not have monthly fees monthly fees are gay as hell. I think it could be a really good game. If they make it well enough maybe even better than guild wars.

  76. 76 Guild wars LOVA Jan 20th, 2007 at 12:45 am

    Heh….. i hope its fun….. well i own warcraft the frozen throne and its fun. I dont own wow i hate it. the monthly fees

  77. 77 PEACH Jan 20th, 2007 at 11:06 pm

    soo when is it rlly coming out am rdy to jack it rofl!

  78. 78 tarloy Jan 24th, 2007 at 3:12 am

    get rid of the sword of tyrael who fell below the tomb

  79. 79 tarloy Jan 24th, 2007 at 3:58 am

    maybe the dark wanderer took the great sword while Tyrael is on battle w/ Baal… But the question is where did he placed it? the poor angel’s sword is missing! It’s a Quest…. why?.. why is it difficult for the angels to fight the evil forces? I suggest an ANGEL character, give them a chance to be a hero this time! They’re supposed to be stronger than the mortals… get rid of it!!!

  80. 80 tarloy Jan 24th, 2007 at 6:06 am

    yeah! I agree, a gladiator is fine and sounds interesting, replaces a warrior & the barbarian…. but, how about a vampire hunter like the Belmont clan. if you were aware of konami’s masterpiece.. equiped w/ a whip as his major weapon, some holy items and magical relics….somethin like that! and/or a vampire character who’s turning into a beast and different kind of creature’s, casting dark spells and allied w/ horrible monsters! what do ya think?… … bad idea isnt? he he he.. ho ho..

  81. 81 zz Jan 24th, 2007 at 9:56 pm

    i dont care what its like as long as it is free to play online.

  82. 82 ryan Jan 25th, 2007 at 9:30 am

    i dont see why the new patch doesnt come out with new skills, and a couple new items, i mean how hard would that be? I mean if you can make an uber tristram why cant you make a new helmet, SOMETHING COOL!

  83. 83 nick Jun 28th, 2008 at 5:19 pm

    how many chars will there be and what will they be…

  84. 84 FlygarN Jun 28th, 2008 at 9:22 pm

    what about a more aggresive(barb), some sort off tank, druid, assassin(light but fast attacks), sorc, necromanser, healer and a big open world…. more classes and char apperence.. “””World of diablo”””

  85. 85 hates mmorpg Jun 28th, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    dude some guy, i admire what you posted.

    i believe that characters that share skills and abilities is boring. i believe that a good game doesnt have 5-7 cliche characters. i believe that a GOOD (i emphasize good because ive yet to find a good computor game) game has 3-4 characters that are original, that have some uniqueness compared to the other characters in the game, and compared to other games with similar characters.

    For example, i wish the necro was pure summoner or pure poison or bone, a hybrid of the three just ruins him. the warrior or barb should not be able able to use long range weapons unless its spears that can be thrown, because a barb in himself lacks the dexterity, and the soft touch required for a accurate bow. Also mages should be split into two-three characters. a healer/ preist, a elemental mage that only uses one or two of the elements, not all three. (see maple story for best example in my opinion for mages layout)

    If it were up to me, (and keep in mind i am a senior in hs, i do not have some huge degree in engineering or what have you, im simplying basing this on personal preference) I would engineer the characters as follows:

    Assassin- capable of using bows and daggers and katars, nothign else, traps are more realistic, like a explosion or something, and they concentrate more on stealth and poison and killing monsters secretely than anything else.

    Monk- Healer, uses no weapons except for perhaps a staff, uses magic to cure, heal, and uses holy to damamge only undead or demonic monsters, and uses abilities to enchant oneself with holy damage on fists or what have you. uses vials and empty bottles and herbs to create healing potions, which is how he heals, i do not believe in using a heal spell, thats boring, lets be a little original shall we? lets use remedies and magic to make healing pots.

    Gladiator- Melee tank character, uses weapons swords, shields, spears, and javis. nothing else, his long range comes from spears and javis no bows. Typical warrior or barb character follows his layout.

    wiazard- i firmly believe the wizard class should be separated into two different wizards, one with wind/fire, the other with lightening/ water. Wind attacks are like, hurricane for the druid, and water is like ice attacks for the sorc. Maple story has a similar layout as this and i think its better because having one wizard controlling all elements is soo cliche and so boring, but it takes skil to only weild two or one element and still be a strong character. As for weapons, standard wizard weapons aply, wands, orbs etc…

    Witch doctor- uses home mad potions, and summons monster to do his will. represents a summoner with earth property magic locked within his potions. pure summoner, and uses potions, and other home made remedies to acheieve his ways. this character would force blizzard to put vials, and empty bottles into their game which would vastly improve gameplay for the witch docter. summons twisted monsters to battle the other twisted, demonic monsters of the diablo universe. fetishes, and what not. No hand weapons are used, only has earth elemental powers locked away in his herbs and empty vials and pots he collects which he then combines to create potions with attacks like: poison gas, created by collecting poison flower petals and a empty vial and combining to create poison gas attack.

    this is just how i would arrange a game, because diablo two was a great game, but the characters were too split apart, two characters like the sin and the zon couldve been combined into a real assasin character. Also concentrate more on each characters strengths, the sin in d2 expansion was not sneaky enough for me, i wish there was more invisibility and dagger stabbing from him and less summon traps and sit back and watch them kill everything. And split the mages, trust me u wont regret it. :) thanx for reading guys, appreciate it

  86. 86 diablo3 woot Jun 28th, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    a good awsome rpg to play is called enclave. play that game and blizzard should base their characters like that. same play style, and same characters base. except the sorc. the sorc in that game sux ass. but the sin and barb are amazing!

  87. 87 Love MMorpgs Jul 2nd, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    Hey Hates MMorpgs

    You’re an idiot
    1.characters that have 3 different speculations is good so you don’t see the same people every day.

    2.Hybrid never ruins a game, Notice thats why you never see a barb using a bow because of that, and but some like to dual-wield so yeah, people can do what they want with there characters you don’t have to tell the makers what to do, to make YOUR (crappy) good game.

    3. the classes division…
    (A) Assassin is MELEE, the Zon RANGE, one uses bows and arrows to kill, the other uses melee. too be honest that is the most over powered class you’d see. Blizzard wouldn’t make a 2 classes if they were meant for the same thing.

    (B)Some weapons give different effects depending on what it is, you should know that if you’re such a game expert.

    (C)Gladiator….Paladins? w/e no matter they can use what they want, too be honest, if they want to go off class then sure. some tank classes use massive two handers to solo.

    (D) wind? Nature = Druid…and sorc had Fire,ice, lightening.

    (E)Witch doctors… those wouldn’t be a summoners, i see them more like shamans, maybe spirits, but i don’t see them as Pure summoners, and with casters… you never hack in slash unless its a slight hybrid.

    Diablo 2 characters weren’t split apart at all they all had there own class speculations, combining sin(Rogue) and Amazon(Marksmin) would make one op class, Maybe sin wasn’t suppose to be so sneaky, maybe it was mostly a trap and ambush…Mages were split idiot, One elemental mage (Sorc), one caster set in the way of Nature, and shapeshifting (Druid) and one in Necro, undead summoners and affliction.

    Too me, i think your post was the biggest waste of time, and to try to judge classes before the game is even out, thinking you can make the game how you’d like i don’t see that either, Diablo 2 had a good system and if they add the same one in this one it’ll still be good, just deal with what happens.

    Now i must say they shouldn’t make this game a MMo though

  88. 88 ur all retarded.... Jul 3rd, 2008 at 2:51 am

    ok d2 is also a single player game.. and the bs about having all 3 trees to lvl off of… check ur fuckin skill points you can mayb make a hybrid of 2 trees but even then only 1 is gonna be maxed so stop complaining that omg the sorc can do all elements… not really its what you choose to lvl n usually u pick 1 as main 2nd as… w/e the fuck u want it for, a 2ndary main or for example a summoning necro with poison nova… yea i use that nova when im surrounded then run away while a few things die n summon some more to keep me from dieing… fuck… and yea d3 is awesome d2 is deadly and d1 had its moments but being a good story is just that its a good story.. lets moove on a game is a game meant to be played not there to give ya a bunch of fuckin storyline… n at least d2 holds its story line u ppl shuld be complaining about zelda or sum shit have u ever tried to figure which is the sequel/prequel to which? it dont make sence n tetre/sheik/zelda… 1 person how is link that fuckin stupid

  89. 89 ur all retarded.... Jul 3rd, 2008 at 3:02 am

    1 more thing d3 is like d2 no mmorpg bs theres only been 2 chars that have been publicly announced n they are… re-released barb and a witch doctor male n female r choices. the game includes bosses sub bosses and mini bosses just go to the blizzard website the game looks fantastic nice amounts of blood great enviro detail n the skill switch is great acceseble with a scroll wheel or the tab button to switch thru… get tired of whirlwind just scroll down n select a new attack… kinda like weapon switch on fps games like halflife/2… and for that retarded remark on the dark wanderer.. he is diablo.. u just decide to not load the cinematic disks or what?

  90. 90 Syke Jul 3rd, 2008 at 3:33 am

    Some Guy you are my inspiration me and my family (a.k.a. DAD) have played diablo 1 and 2 and i remeber spending hours one 1 and on 2 just trying to level id find a decent spot go there totally grind for hours on mobs that respawn and are very easy to kill… i could play WoW for this i believe that as a choice for gamers that blizzard should let you have a choice play multi for grinding and respawning and single for a good story with a solid ending this would of course have to be a very long campaign and they should keep online chars separate from single player 1′s ill break down diablo 1 and 2
    Diablo #1
    this has a limited multiplayer but is mainly focused on a great story and good items its more realistic once you kill the zombie the zombie do not come back yes we had stats and levels but they were more limited to challenge us as players and that is what makes it a good game walking has it advantages too it takes more time to go from place to place(more realistic) im sure youre not running 24/7 why should you’re character it was horrific the blood the gore the things that pop out of nowhere just to piss you off and when you do youre finishing blow the head of the zombie flies off the classes were very unique the Melee Class Ranged Class and Spell Class this actually makes each character an individual and not oh well this is a good power for my mage i wonder if my rouge has it…(less realistic) no not in D1 they were individual and guess what there was a distict funtion of each class not healer/fighter and not warrior/ranger ummm wait i wanted to do melee why do i havea bow in my hand again….(less realistic) real warriors actually trained and chose our favorite weapon sword spear scyth 2h sword this is what it is like for D1(more realistic) if you were fighting undead creature isnt blood and gore and so much more so much more realistic!!! especially if youre fighting the god of hatred and his un(dead) army shouldnt there be corpses and blood everywhere D2 took this feature out i remember being so scared to death when somin popped out at me i hit the pause button so fast to make it stop
    Diablo 2:
    i will take a quote from one of their reveiws
    “while Diablo was concentrated on storyline Diablo 2 was more for the multiplayer function of the game” we expected a gore filled game not im out in the middle of the desert lets kill this scorpion 400 times so i can get that awesome spell i wanted diablo 2s only job and goal was to fill in holes from D1 not take it up a knotch in another chapter its more like an extension that explains D1 if you wanted action that suprises thrills scares and drives you forward than stick with diablo 1 if you wanted to call everyone 5 levels below you a n00b go to diablo 2 and if you wanted more mixed not distinct classes and if you want to kill the same monster in the same spot with the exact same weapons in the exact same spot forever so you have a high enough levelto get that level 37 spell you saw some other character using go with diablo 2
    Honestly people who likes grinding anyway… its boring as H3ll
    heres my definiton of an mmorpg
    MMORPG:
    a game with massive population that features a party system, clans, other players with same skills level rankings among players and an endless supply of monsters with the same XP EXP or experience which often lagggggggggs your character may get killed by other players with a PVP or plaer verus player system and to gain levels end up doing the same thing for hours at a time

    Diablo 2 figured out if they could steer towards mmorpg qualities more masses of buyers and subscriber would come therefore ruining a perfect game to make more $$$ and to make a game so repetitive that evantually player would get bored so give away characters on ebay for free or sell the game and characters

    sorry if D3 is anything like its predecessor Diablo 2 you will be very disappointed

  91. 91 dderf9 Jul 3rd, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    Diablo 3 classes so far are the old fashion barbarian and a new class, the Witch Doctor! See for yourself at http://www.blizzard.com/diablo3 . If anyone hears about another class please post it because I am dying to hear of the other three. =)

  92. 92 Peter Jul 3rd, 2008 at 9:14 pm

    First of all Diablo One and its expansion are not considered Horror games they are RPG dungeon games. There have been many of these games created over the course of time, and the fact of it being scary or not does not mean anything. if any of you where actually scared by Diablo then you should go back and play the game one more time because the game isn’t actually scary and i played it when i was nine, i can’t see why any of you should think the same thing. Secondly Diablo 2 is one of the best RPG games ever created and it didnt have different Genders. And regardless of what people think or say Diablo 2 is one of the best games made in history because blizzard was accually able to keep a player base long enough to make a 3. So i’m sure “Some guy” that there are more people on this planet that think this game is going to rock and that Diablo 2 with out any doubt will be amazing. I have faith in Blizzards ablilty to make amazing games and they have yet to disappoint me.

  93. 93 Spilter Jul 4th, 2008 at 2:28 am

    I must agree with Peter about the fact that the Diablos where amazing and that Diablo 3 (!!!!) will be amazing. I was wondering if anyone knew about the other classes that will be in Diablo 3. My guess would be that the Necromancer will be replaced by the witch-doctor? My only hope is that it comes out fast.
    Well that is all for now from me Diablers cya

  94. 94 jongetz Jul 4th, 2008 at 8:11 am

    A big NO NO for Diablo being a MMORPG. Please NO!!

  95. 95 admin Jul 4th, 2008 at 8:33 am

    Diablo 3 is NOT going to be an MMO… relax :)

  96. 96 Brock lol Jul 4th, 2008 at 9:10 am

    im kewl

  97. 97 Jugs Jul 4th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    Diablo I was great, Diablo II was great. Diablo III is great. You are all forgetting one factor that made Diablo II amazing… THE COW LEVEL!

  98. 98 Lord Necros Jul 4th, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    I hope III keeps the Gothic. That is what makes the game, its dark gothic, spooky feel while you play. Almost like a continous haunting that you enjoy. The sound track and dark feel are very important and need to be kept.
    Also, its important to keep the solo option avalable. I like battle net play but solo can be cool also.
    Charecters to think about when 4 is created are
    Witch
    Warlock
    Shapeshifter
    War Lord
    One other thing, add difficulty options also.
    Novis, Experianced, Hell.

  99. 99 Necrophobia Jul 5th, 2008 at 1:27 am

    I agree with Lord Necros and Some Guy (who posted his stuff about 2 years ago) I mean you kinda want a feeling of fear and adrenaline when u play a game like diablo… you don’t neccesarily wanna crap ur pants every time u turn a corner.. and yeah keep the gothic satanic feeling to it.. i honestly think the best part of the game is facing creatures from hell, i mean, it just feels really good killing a demon from hell then wiping his sanguine blood off your axe, sword, or whatever you used to kill him.

    Oh and I really like the little movies it showed with breaking down walls and crap to kill monsters and the witch doctor’s wall of zombies and locust swarm thing. oh and I’m not exactly sure who posted this but i think he was right when he said u should make a demonologist class, you know like a combo of druid’s shapeshifting stuff but with demons and necromancer’s summoning and some spells from sorcerer/sorceress from D1 and D2.

  100. 100 Necrophobia Jul 5th, 2008 at 1:32 am

    Oh and before I go to sleep and forget this.. why is it that France or Europe or whatever got it before us honest Americans? I mean, what’s up with that? r u using them as ur lil guenei(don’t know how to spell it) pigs to test the game?

  101. 101 enjoto Jul 5th, 2008 at 5:27 am

    I see that this is the same barbarien from diablo 2 but he is little older :D i an’t wait to see the game

  102. 102 William Hart Jul 5th, 2008 at 9:31 pm

    While I agree that Diablo II suffered in terms of the scary atmosphere, the sheer extra amount of items and different areas and huge boss fights all made it so much grander in scheme. I also disagree that the single player suffered, I played solo almost the whole time and thoroughly enjoyed every step of the tale. This one is supposed to have an advanced randomized quest feature which will greatly enhance replayability even though this series is hugely replayable anyway. And from what I’ve seen of Diablo III, it looks like they’re mixing in some of the gory horror back into the game. That one shot of Diablo himself looks absolutely amazing and much more frightening than past incarnations.

    As for returning classes… the more I think about it, the more it seems we’ll have almost the same thing as last time. The Witch Doctor is basically a revamped Necromancer, the Barbarian is the same, we’ll surely get a Sorceror type and an Amazon / Rogue type as well. The Paladin was my personal favorite and I hope something close to that appears in this one (maybe just Knight or Cavalier or Cleric, make him look a little different like the Witch Doctor). The real question to me is if they’ll have an expansion with extra classes after the game comes out in which case it’ll be fun to speculate on new ones.

    I am most pleased to see that they retained the classic look and didn’t go for a straight up MMORPG. That would have ruined the entire thing for me but this looks like a natural upgrade to an already solid game. Add in the idea that we’ll have the normal quests along with random ones constantly being available, you could get lost in this one forever. Time for us to save the world one more time.

  103. 103 Something Jul 7th, 2008 at 12:51 am

    Dude get over it Diablo 1 was boringish but still alright 8/10
    When D2 got freaking people playing for 9 freaking years straight and if u ever got bored of D2 wat do you do?!?!? you mess up ur account and see if u could restore it that was always fun or you could try and make your own overpowerd build for a palading or a sorceress or my personal favorite the druid but still D2 was the shizzle when it came to games that came out in 1999 so Diablo 2 was a unforgettable game that recieves a 10/10

  104. 104 ~xXx~ Jul 7th, 2008 at 5:15 am

    i think diablo 3 should have about 10 types of characters no just 2 because people should have from what to chose.with just 2 characters people will get bored prety fast of this game.in diablo 2 i playied alot with amazon not with barbarian or sorceres.thats why i think this game (diablo3) should have more types of characters.anyway the graphics are good very good i can say so….i think i will play it…cya all. who want to talk with me will find me at tnd_cyrus@yahoo.com…:)

  105. 105 some guy needs sex Jul 7th, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    some guy, i was just passing by, but i couldnt leave without letting you know youre a complete idiot. yes diablo 1 had a better atmosphere, but do you really have to write a book out of the whole matter?? get a life, stop jerking off at your own words. you dont sound smart, you sound waaaaaay to geeky, and very repetitive. go back to school. fuck face. if it were up to you wed be playing the same game over and over again.

  106. 106 Some Guy is stupid Jul 7th, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    You are pathetic, stop whining!! Diablo 1 & 2 are both great games. Why does it seem that everyone wants Diablo 3 to be the same game as 1 or 2? I read something complaining about D3 yesterday. You guys are a bunch of whiny cunts. Get over it, the game world changes.

  107. 107 Captain Spastic Jul 8th, 2008 at 9:20 am

    Hi

    Personally I totally think Diablo 2 was sheit compared to the first title, a frightening masterpiece of gothic horror.

    Diablo, even if it was a hacknslash game, was a rare jewel like Baldur’s Gate, Fallout 1 (and 2) were.

    But do not expect any ambiance-based or plot and story-based games knowing that every big game companies such as Blizzard just make games for big money. They’ll go for what’s popular and therefore poorly conceived and available to the widest range of gamers.
    I pity all those who think W.O.W is actually a game.
    It’s just a big waste of time with no interest I think, like a cheap book with two words HACK n SLASH you keep re-reading. boring.

    However;
    -Running mode was a good enhancement.
    -The desecrated Cathedral in the first chapter of Diablo2 somehow recalled the ambiance of Tristram. (from chapter 2 you cannot talk about ambiance anymore, already knowing that each chapter will introduce its own cliché environment, which is very predictable)
    That’s all.

    No Farnham the Drunk or NPCs with any background AT ALL.. such a pity.

  108. 108 demon of d1,d2,and d3 Jul 8th, 2008 at 11:55 am

    sup people i know wat year its com9ing outits going to be next year cuz in the youtube preview i watched it said there will be at least 12-18 characters in the game plus they only made like 3 acts out of 7 or 6. so send me a message at power-king@live.com ill tell u everything i know about d3 and im a 12year old ive played d1 d2 and going to play d3. i have 20 lvl 99s in d2. d1 im not sure havent played in a while.

    good-bye and have a nice day

    singed by:demon of d1,d2,and d3

  109. 109 diablofan4life Jul 9th, 2008 at 4:36 am

    I ABSOLUTE LOVE all diablo games… I or II.. i reakon the graphics is just right… not too shabby or not too detailed like ‘oblivion’… also, playin it in 3rd person view is what makes it unique…

    I love the fact that you can choose to PK, kill monsters, MF or do all at the same time… building up your char and knowing how to use yr stats, skill, items all at the same time is the core of playing D2..

    team playing is what diablo 2 was all about… if i absolutely wanted to stick to story-line, i would be playing final fantasy or some sort…

    to ‘some guy’ : cry me a river please !! OWNING ppl in D2,killing bosses all requires skills and that is what makes it interesting.plus, if you have a lil problem with diablo2, why would u play anyway

  110. 110 The_Ghoul_Lord Jul 9th, 2008 at 10:10 am

    All we need is a date baby you know it.

  111. 111 Necrophobia Jul 9th, 2008 at 11:27 pm

    To the retard that said “D2 was the shizzle” first off… that sounded really, REALLY gay! and D2 was really boring since all it was was grinding and noobs hacking and asking for stuff and gold all the time online. And 2 the person who said that Diablo 3 should have more than 2 characters, it will, just they haven’t found any cool things they bothered to develop yet. and to the people/person who said i just want D3 to be just like D1 and D2, i don’t want it to be just like them, i just want a good game that isn’t all about grinding and respawning monsters.. with a lil bit of scariness. no offense meant to anyone cept the first person i responded too |:-p

  112. 112 necrotronic Jul 10th, 2008 at 3:40 am

    i agree with diablofan4life… i think diablo triology games were the bomb… I enjoyed every part of it.. only thing i didnt like was all the hackings which kinda ruined the game.

    however, PKing is as enjoyable and i remembered the days with ITH bows, life leech ammys, small charms, etc…

  113. 113 necrotronic Jul 10th, 2008 at 3:43 am

    oh yeah and to all whiners about how D2 isnt as scary as D1, i didnt find D1 or D2 one bit scary… in fact, i found it quite funny the way the monsters behave and died

  114. 114 this is for "some guy" Jul 10th, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    some guy:
    i was just wondering, how the hell does a game, such as diablo 1, cause anyone fear, or better yet torment (like u said in one of your previous posts)? basically all you say is that you would’ve liked diablo 2 to be scarier. STOP COMPLAINING!!
    first of all the game has already been created and i have a serious doubt that you can change that.

    second, i think that anyone who finds a video game as scary as “some guy” describes it must have either psychological problems or a PUSSY nature. it is impossible to create a game that gives u “NIGHTMARES MAN, NIGHTMARES”. so don’t expect any to come out soon, although by previously reading your posts i have already figured that you in fact have a pussy nature so maybe you got an 80% chance of finding D3 scary.

    third i really get the feeling that u already know how to use the dictionary so please spare us from your full page long posts that are absolutely meaningless and do nothing but repeat yourself and what others think.

  115. 115 Grindaholic Jul 10th, 2008 at 3:42 pm

    Someguy makes some really good points. I dont agree with all his Diablo 2 points but for the most part hes correct. Its a wattered down casualised non-scary mmo-lite.
    Diablo 3 is going to be Diablo 2 but on a certain drug. The drug im talking about is World Of Warcraft and it is contaminating Blizzard’s alternate franchises Starcraft and more specifically Diablo.

    Firstly Diablo isnt Warcraft. Diablo is a gothic inspired universe that is rated M for a fucking reason. They’re are mutilated bodies, relatives and friends of the towns people that have just told you they’re sad tales of survival in the midst of evil and the undead. In diablo 2 there was no such connection, you felt more like a wandering mercenary than a connected character to the universe, from what we have seen from Diablo 3 it is going to be more so in this direction but cleaner (textures are colourful and light) as well the action takes place out doors in sunny and beautiful vistas with waterfalls and i kid you not, a rainbow.
    A fucking rainbow does not belong in Diablo.
    Please sign the petition against this travesty of the Diablo franchise and get this fruity tootey bullshit out of Diablo 3. Thanks.

    Petition:
    http://www.petitiononline.com/d3art/petition.html

  116. 116 Grindaholic Jul 10th, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    Diablo 1 was at times scary because of the pre-story that went into these eerie dungeon scenarios and the way they are pulled off. The best example which has been used frequntly is The Butcher.

    You start talking to the towns people and eventually you hear about this terrible thing that took this little boys leg and he barely survived. Pip is the kids name and the voice acting was alot more convincing as well the music went along alot better with the monologue that in D2, D2 was to eccentric for my taste. You then talk to the Blacksmith and he confirms that he had faught at one point for his life and Pip’s against a creature in the depths of the cathedral. You try to remember and keep your guard up that there is this terrible thing lurking in the cathedral a few floors below but you kinda forget about it after you find a new spell and a few potions upon entering the dungeon. A few minutes later you stumble upon a room that seems to have alot more bodies in it than you usually see. You have a eerier feeling that something might go wrong any second as you approach the gate and put your mouse curser over the grate. You click the mouse button and the hair on the back of your neck stands on end as the gutteral moan of “Auggh, Fresh Meat!” is loudly growled from a dark concave area, all of a sudden a large pale and scarily obese figure with a blood stained cleaver charges you with a blood curdling growl and each time you try and slay him his healthbar only moves a pixel, AAAAAAH!!!!

    That is why diablo 1 is scary.

  117. 117 jackinthebox Jul 10th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

    just wondering is diablo 3 gonna be a pay per month cuz that would really put me off the game i think

  118. 118 jackinthebox Jul 10th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    just to put my 2 cents in the original diablo was much better in story line and I would play it for longer in the 2nd one i got bored within an hour and had to leave and do somehitng else but the original i would like get into a coma and play for hours but dioblo 2 has some features that make it better gameplay wise like a good waypoints system and the ability to run

  119. 119 some person Jul 10th, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    the basic male female forms and such are good but the one thing i hope they bring over from d2 to d3 is the cow level

  120. 120 necrotronic Jul 10th, 2008 at 4:58 pm

    i aint playing if they do decide to charge D3 for play..

    oh and I get the same ‘errie’, ‘adrenalin’ pump from killing DC and a few other bosses in D2… Oh and GET this, blizzard will never be able to make a game to please/scare everyone… everyone has different scary threshold point…

    all comes down to D2 was a strategic game… knowing where to add your skills,stats to complement your items… thats why there are so many character classes you can build… hammerdins, javzons, thundersorc, etc…TO those who said they wanted specific class char.. YO! thats why each char has 3 skill trees so u can choose how you want to build your char….

    All i can suggest to blizzard is that ‘hackers ruin games’ and the only downfall to D2 was players are not able to keep up with the constant changin versions… the main reason why i gave up.

  121. 121 pen15 Jul 12th, 2008 at 2:43 am

    LOLz pen15

  122. 122 rick james Jul 13th, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    i hope you guys add more characters…all i can see is just to of them…put some new ones plz…..

  123. 123 sigh.... Jul 14th, 2008 at 1:25 am

    the game is way too influenced for 8 year olds, i mean the wow cartoon graphics, the ability to go back and change your character build…. takes all the real skill out of a game, all the fun…

  124. 124 sigh.... Jul 14th, 2008 at 1:35 am

    the only thing that can save diablo now is the plot and gameplay, which i think already is more wow styled than TRUE diablo (AKA : Diablo 1) which since the lord of terror…diablo… is now a big red cartoon character that probobally will smile at you as you easily kill him with a really cheap runeword…(yes the powerful runewords killed d2 for me… anyone could teleport and kill the 3 brothers without even trying? that was complete bullshit for me…)

    the gear also ruined it… i no longer had to use skill.. all just how i was geared… but i did really like the build for d2, required some skill, cant go, “oops let me pay 100 gold and change my build” it was, “o damn now i learned that i cant do that anymore… i actually need to learn a bit to get good at this game.”

    finally id say blizzard you let me down… again*

  125. 125 sigh.... Jul 14th, 2008 at 1:51 am

    lol just looked at blizz website, map of d3 word looks like map of wow world……..fuck this just keeps getting worse and worse… some guy – man you got it right like what? a year and a half ago i think? i think you knew all along that d3 was going to take a turn for the worse… and you were very right… i dont know if anyone will read this… but d3 will make me and many more people lost for a game that is intense, hard, and rated M for a reason… this game will make the WoW heavens tremble, not the Diablo’s….

  126. 126 omen666 Jul 14th, 2008 at 10:42 am

    i h8 when ppl overlook healing in diablo 2 because there was indeed one, its just that its damage overpowered its healing and there was no need for it. the paladin has holy bolt, FoH which spreads holy bolts, prayer, and cleansing and meditation which recieve bonuses from prayer.

  127. 127 omen666 Jul 14th, 2008 at 10:49 am

    and theres another problem too, but a much MUCH bigger one.

    idc if its graphics look like wow, or it holds some similarities, but if the gameplay is like wow, we have a problem. diablo 1, the original, was amazing because it scared people with its atmosphere into playing it. you walked through a big huge cathedral that had 14 or 15 floors (i forget) barely being lit by torches only to find a body that was impaled on a spear, not some cartoony zombies or some lost gaurds.

    theres a reason why wow beat the crap outta diablo and thats cuz it was 3D and was bigger. i think the concept of diablo was much much better than wow’s.

    wow isnt the best game out there, i think diablo definetly has the potential to beat it, but it cant beat it if it turns into it…

  128. 128 sigh.... Jul 14th, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    i dont agree with the wow beating the crap outa diablo because it appeals to a younger crowd, but when you are 16,17, or 18 that cartoon bullshit just gets on your nerves, and yea… by the way look at the skills bar… just like wows…. i dont think diablo has a chance in hell

  129. 129 Kyle Jul 16th, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    …. which doctor… world of warcraft much? :( disapointment so far.

  130. 130 Spilter Jul 22nd, 2008 at 3:59 am

    Stop comparing WOW and the diablos because i’m sure that 95% or more of the ppl that is replying here is gonna buy d3. Stop arguing about the negative points think about “wow the continuation of diablo nice”

    P.S. don’t reply about what i said

  131. 131 Orphen Jul 22nd, 2008 at 6:10 am

    I think diablo 2 was a great game and fun to play, but its amost a completly different game to diablo 1. Other then 1 or 2 things its almost no relation to the 1st game at all. Being able to customise your character could be alright but not going to make/break the game. Some guy has a lot of good points, dont agree 100% but meh lol. i liked where u said Tell me, what explains a god damned yetti?!?! i loled. diablo 1 definitly had a ‘darker’ theme to it. if someone showed me diablo 2 but didnt tell me the name i dont think i could guess it was diablo. diablo 1 was more like 10 enemies small room find a way to kill them, diablo 2 1000 enemies large area small some spell wipe them all out, though ad thing in diablo 1 was being able to duplicate lol. and the walking to the witch lol. the skill tress in diablo 2 killed the exitment of finding a book. even thought each char had 3 skill trees there were pretty much a select set of spells u would get cause all the rest just sucked, if u go on diablo 2 online how often u c a sorc with hydra or anything, only ever uses frozen orb. to ‘ur all retarded’ your just a complete moron who should waste him time somewhere else.

  132. 132 Orochimaru Jul 25th, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    I think the classes may be: barbarian
    Witchdoctor
    Vampire( mage)
    Paladin
    Asassin

  133. 133 Khysz3rvhysz97 Jul 29th, 2008 at 8:47 am

    so w3ak?! i don† wan† †o wai† †oo Long!

  134. 134 mrayner Jul 31st, 2008 at 1:21 am

    I agree with Guy on this matter completely. Diablo 2 was a let down when I first played, but have come to accept it (as I do enjoy the multiplayer aspects and I have lost my Diablo 1 :( ) Diablo 1, when I first played it in grade 7 under the house in the basement (study) with the lights off, breeze blowing in the window and volume loud sent shivers down my spine and made spin in my chair just to make sure no evil dispicable foul creatures were sneaking up on me O.o

    I loved that game, and I hope that Blizzards take the original horror of Diablo 1 into the creation of Diablo 3.

    Bring on the swetting, the shivers and the switching off the computer and walking away to hide under the blankets.

    LONG LIVE DIABLO 1!!

    mrayner

  135. 135 DSnider Jul 31st, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    The horror, music and just plain out creepyness was wat diablo 1 had. And i agree that was bad@$$. but the fact that not every char was unique in everyway is wat tore me from D1 to D2. The only dif was stats, physical features, and the fact that som chars were better with certain weps. but it wasn’t enough. they could all hav the same skills, armor and wat not. But thats where WoW coms in. its a bad@$$ game but definitly to cartoony and the F***ing skill tree is a pain the @$$. But if Diablo 3 can keep similar gameplay or better, WoW graphics, diablo 1 environment persay, (and not jus two chars, hopfully they’ll make more soon) a long good storyline with some quests (not 1000 like WoW) then F*** YEA i’ll buy my own laptop JUST 4 diablo 3. Id be willing to spend over a grand and a half 4 a laptop just for that game! Not getting my hopes up tho. and sure ain’t buyin that laptop till i know.

  136. 136 Boneslasher Aug 10th, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    Personally i think that the Witch Doctor Sucks. Although i find that the abilities are plain beautiful, i think that the design of the WD is just horribly outplaced in the Diablo universe. I would rather have the good old necromancer back. This “Witch Doctor is just a War3 Witch Doctor (same name!) and walks and stands like a troll. This is not improving the design of the game: this is Copy-Pasting.
    The classes that i would rather see improved are the paladin and necromancer. Inkeeping with the Gothic-Fantasy theme, these two were the ones that REALLY fit 100 per cent in a universe with this definition. (Mind you, i have played EVERY class in diablo so far, and i liked them all). I think that the sorceress should be improved by making a spellcasting class similar to Drognan in a way, a mage that can summon creatures and control the elements in a sort of Vizier style.

  137. 137 druid Aug 13th, 2008 at 3:42 pm

    i am a huge druid fan in diablo 2, can someone tell me if the here any thing about Diablo 3 druids

  138. 138 gfhjmfj Aug 15th, 2008 at 11:26 am

    mmm

  139. 139 big druid fan Aug 15th, 2008 at 11:54 am

    they must keep the druid ive beaten the game with every character the druid is one of the funest to play the game with it will be a disapponment if they get rid of the druid.

    i think if they added a character that was half-human half-devil(or half-dragon) or maybe a character that is half-human and half-angel would be way sick and the idea of creating your character farther then before would be cool.

    i think they should throw in a BIGGER VERIATY of WEAPONS

    RECOMMEND READING THIS REPLY IT MIGHT GIVE U AN IDEA

  140. 140 Yakomuto Aug 15th, 2008 at 7:21 pm

    I’m Sorry? 2 Classes in a Great looking game Like Diablo 3?

    Why In Gods Name… would you do that.

    You get you’re Warrior,You’re Mage,you’re Archer, N some Other cool Class like A Druid or Paladin or what not.

    You don’t Get a Witch Doctor and A barbarian and you say there Were done.

    You just don’t …

    I Hope they Make some more Classes … If not I don’t think I’ll be playing this.

  141. 141 IloveDiablogames Aug 21st, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Ok first there is going to be 5 classes and each one of them you can choose female and male and no one knows yet when the game will be released becuse only 2 classes been created and there is 5 and plus they want to make this game fun, exiting and polished as much as possible!:)

  142. 142 fuck someguy Aug 22nd, 2008 at 12:28 am

    i hate that asshole… give me back the fuckin 15 minutes i just spent reading that.

  143. 143 JayOh Aug 23rd, 2008 at 7:32 am

    ok i did a search on youtube and i found out that diablo is using healing orbs after killing creators. If its true then i think it would make the game easyer and not as fun as the other diablo games. I think it was better when you had to use potions.

  144. 144 Drow fan Aug 24th, 2008 at 4:40 am

    what about drows. that would be so cool if they had drows or something.

  145. 145 That One guy Aug 26th, 2008 at 6:16 am

    i r heartz teh diablo!!!!!!111!!!1111!!!!111!1!!!one!!!11!11!!on3!1!1

  146. 146 myself Aug 26th, 2008 at 9:57 am

    to necrophobia, it’s a matter of sales statistics and that kind of stuff, europe is a much bigger region than America when you look at the population statistics. Besides, blizzard is a european (German i think) company. therefore it would be alot easier to first release it in europe than America. america almost never get a game first, it would be like stealing money frome 1 kid and then walk away when there is 4 kids standing next to him that you could have stolen the money from.

  147. 147 Joe Aug 28th, 2008 at 6:27 am

    hey is there going to be more than two characters…and is d3 going to be free!!!??????

  148. 148 Antzalougian Aug 31st, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    when diablo 3
    come to europe? if someone know sent a message to antzalougian@hotmail.com… plz

  149. 149 jovlox Sep 7th, 2008 at 12:19 am

    Is D3 available now???????……..

  150. 150 the boi of the year Sep 8th, 2008 at 11:26 pm

    y cant sum1 leave a comment sayin what characters there will be i came to this website to find out. Is it the same or is there more because i realy want to know so can someone please leave a comment sayin this to me. I play diablo 2 closed and open on open i have kick ass hacks funki and even legits and on closed were there is no hacks i ahve a lvl 97 zon, 94 druid, and 99 barb took a long time to make em but it was worth it so thank you for listening plz post and comment character

  151. 151 Tacos Sep 20th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

    Uhh guys…… first of all diablo 3 is going to have 5 Classes/Characters. Yes you can Change your gender on your classes. There is most likely gonna be a expansion… adds like 3-5 more characters.. they havnt said what other classes on d3 is going to be besides Witchdoctor and Barbarian. No the game will not be Free. and i pray that d3 will not be a mmo .. i’d rather have it like d2 bnet and if u dont like online there is also SinglePlayer.theres rumors about it coming in at FEBURARY 2009…. so yeah… guys we still got a long wait… but also i think Witchdoctor replaced Necromancer… i also hope they got TrapSin… its the best ! :D so yeah. guys u gotta wait

  152. 152 -AAT-DEVILSDEMON Sep 21st, 2008 at 6:20 pm

    The only Characters they will transfer over was going to be the Barb, they wanted the game to be as fresh as possible, they may merge some Chars together to make a new one like they have done with the WitchDoctor.

  153. 153 KURTIS DAWE Sep 21st, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    fucking amazing!!! i cant fucking wait!!!! blizzard should m,ake a diablo movie!!!! get like that huge mother fucker from troy, boagrious. to play the barbarian and make all the chRACTERS AMAZING!!!!

  154. 154 jing Oct 6th, 2008 at 12:33 am

    yo, i love babarian.

  155. 155 Drow fan Oct 8th, 2008 at 5:14 am

    im serious hey should put drows in the game that would be so cool.

  156. 156 druid Oct 11th, 2008 at 7:59 am

    hey, i just looked on the blizzard website and saw that they made a new class, Wizard

  157. 157 that guy Oct 17th, 2008 at 2:27 pm

    they have thwizard like druid said and they have male and female choice! wooooooooooooo

  158. 158 sigh Oct 27th, 2008 at 1:37 am

    stop complaining, if you dont like the new diablo, then dont play.

    if you are too close minded and loves to stick to your old games, then stick with it. go play old diablo 1 until you grow old.

    diablo 2 is much better than diablo 1, although i thought Bhaal ingame looks a bit different from the cinematics.. which is weird.

    anyway diablo 2 is a good game. lots of people criticize yet still play the game. people who compares that diablo 1 is grimmer than diablo 2. it has a better story line than d2, etc etc.. you are just too closed minded and hates changes or new stuffs.

    if blizzard made diablo 2 similiar as diablo 1, that would be f&*#, why bother making d2 if its the same as d1. so all those who keeps complaining, go play your old diablo 1 until you grow old. while we enjoy playing diablo2 and the new diablo3.

    oh yeah, diablo3 will be great, everyone who played the demo were amazed so stop complaining and stfu.

  159. 159 grown Oct 29th, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    barbarin the more strong!!!!!
    the full caracter the best!!!!!
    time to die paladin!!!!!!

  160. 160 fucking toy Oct 31st, 2008 at 1:42 am

    When Blizzards show us the next one character?

  161. 161 Save N Exit Nov 11th, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    i love all u fuck tards who bitch about paying 4 wow grow up get a job idoits . so many say u tryed it ohh i made it to lvl 9 n got bored . ummm lmao

  162. 162 druid Nov 11th, 2008 at 6:54 pm

    any word on druids yet,

  163. 163 some guy licks balls Nov 24th, 2008 at 5:01 am

    You all fail at knowing anything about Diablo series. Go kill ur parents for having you…

  164. 164 MisterNecro Dec 20th, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    I didn´t played D1, and played D2 only 4 to 5 years. But if I know one thing, it is that a game has to have a good story and atmosphere. The Story in D2 is not really bad, but it would be great, if D3 has a better one. I won´t buy it if its like wow. besides I think that it would be a good thing to combine D1 and 2. It would be good too, if there would be some “Mage Clan” (Or others, Warrior Gild for example) you´d have to join to get skills. The Charackter´s looking (skin color and so on) should be choiceable before game starts, and the skills should be got by winning against other People of the Townsfolk in a “Training Area” or such, to earn their respect.

    I have a question to this one who has written that the game is nearly finished an why someguy think that he can change it now:

    Did you already read the Date of someguy´s statement???

    P.S. Sorry for all the spellingmistakes and my bad english.

  165. 165 fraggle Dec 21st, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    there is a theory that d3 will come out 09/09/09 if you’ve read the theory it makes soo much sense. but i think the release date should be today. cause even if it does suck itll still be better than playing gta or some gay game like that.

  166. 166 MisterNecro Dec 22nd, 2008 at 1:41 am

    yeah, you´re right

  167. 167 fraggle Dec 22nd, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    so a day has passed since i wrote that and d3 still isnt out :(

  168. 168 lol Jan 5th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    well i like diablo 2 great game not so much graphic wise but still great game and the way to get new gear made me angrey make it more like an mmo or like an action game ether way its will be good

  169. 169 Diablo4evr Jan 9th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    >< will buy Diablo3 nomatterwhat! I believe Blizzard makes it the perfect Diablo! (orelse i will haunt blizzard down, even if its the last thing i do) ;|

  170. 170 uGotMe Jan 12th, 2009 at 6:17 am

    I wont buy diablo 3 for sure…because i will get pirated copy.(3rd world…you know)
    Hey will there be any sorcerer in Diablo 3? That was my favorite in Diablo 2.

  171. 171 tosomeguy Feb 1st, 2009 at 1:52 am

    id love ta kick u in the fucken balls

  172. 172 randomguy Feb 17th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    They need books and scrolls that let you cast spells other than identify and town portal
    I think thay had that in D1

    If thay don’t think its fare to the spell caster class let them combine spells
    ex. necromancer uses summon skeliton + scroll of summon = summon demon

  173. 173 randomguy Feb 17th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    They need books and scrolls that let you cast spells other than identify and town portal
    I think thay had that in D1

    If thay don’t think its fare to the spell caster class let them combine spells
    ex. necromancer uses summon skeliton + scroll of summon skeliton = summon demon

  174. 174 LOL get laid nerds Feb 20th, 2009 at 6:10 am

    I can’t believe the stupidity of most of you! Games will always change from better to worse or worse to better in different aspects of the game, never will there be a perfect game, I think the diablo series are all good and three will own all, so go summon a gay porno instead of playing with your Druids vine you silly fags

  175. 175 LOL get laid nerds Feb 20th, 2009 at 6:18 am

    by the way it’s playing with your self if you shake more than twice……………..sorry I gotta agree with someguy but dam man u didn’t need to wright a book LOL I took two breaks n jerked off to porn before I was even half through ya post

  176. 176 LOL get laid nerds Feb 20th, 2009 at 6:27 am

    so take my post and shove it up your ass duck face I’ll fucking suck off mephisto while I’ll give duriel a reach around while tyreall jerks off watching diablo carpet surf andariel as all of the stones bust in your loose hellforge you use concentrate as my poison vine penetrated a crushing blow on your backdoor

  177. 177 doidie Mar 20th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    I play WoW. I love MMORPGs. Diablo is a great game but i do not want to see it become a MMORPG. Blizzard already has an MMORPG, they dont need another. Diablo has a great story but the characters and creatures need major work. I briefly played D1 so i cant really say much about it but from what i read it sounds a lot better.

    First i think it would be a great idea to have character customization. Change your hear style, skin color etc. Maby some tatoos. Even though you probably would be able to see it you would know it was there. I think that the more you can change your character to the way you want it, the more you will be able to play the game as “your character”.

    D3 should have an online option but it should not be based off online play like the paladin is. Even though blizzard may say “Each class is easily soloable” or whatever I dont want to see a spell description that says “for you and your party”. I would still like the option to go online and play with other people.

    Spells……need i complain what i hate about them? There needs to be a whole new system. Like what i read above about D1, it would be cool if you learned spells from books you found. Each class should have their own spells and some classes should share spells. To upgrade with spells there should be like “xp” for each time you cast the spell. Once you have casted it a certain amount of times it will advance a level. The only thing you should get for gaining a level is stat points.

    For D3 it hard to pick what kind of classes you would like or what there will be. Just the wizard, barbarian, and Witch doctor has been released so far. Of course we all seen the sorceress coming back. The barbarian is also back. I think blizz made a bad idea with the witch doctor. From what ive seen and heard about the witch doctor, i think it has replaced the necromancer and the druid. I believe this was the biggest mistake. If i had to keep one it would of been the necromancer. I also think the paladin is going to come back. I just hope hes not replaced with a priest or something. After all, if your fighting demons you need holy power. For the fifth class i would like a druid but something is missing. The amazon type of character. I think (not hope) the fifth character will be a amazon or a hunter (similar to WoW)

    “assaulting his victim’s mind and body with elixirs and powders that evoked fires, explosions, and poisonous spirits. As if these assaults were not enough, the witch doctor also had at his command the ability to summon undead creatures from the netherworld to rend the flesh from his enemy’s body.” -www.blizzard.com

    One thing i hate about D2 is you level to slowly. When i was leveling my first character, an amazon, i got to duriel and i died in 3 hits. In D2 you wernt prepared for any of the boses. Thats the main reason it got boring. You had to go back and “grind” to get ready for the boss. There need to be a better quest system with quests that arnt lame like “go get me 10 purple flowers and ill give you this big glowy sword”. Each elite creature should have a quest to kill it. I want more quests and no grinding. If you have to grind or like what was said “if someone says grind then the game was a failure” (it isnt word for word but it gets the point across and i not looking for it).

    For the release, it wont be soon with the release of WotLK (Wrath of the Lick king, expansion for WoW) and the updates for it. I think it will be late 2009 or 2010 before they even put a release date. I think it will come out late 2011 or 2012

  178. 178 MR X Mar 22nd, 2009 at 6:26 am

    Actually the paladin on diablo 2 can heal team mates with his holy bolt skill

  179. 179 Michael dianda Apr 19th, 2009 at 7:34 am

    diablo is better then any game i played in my whole freaken life…

  180. 180 Kanastag Apr 29th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    Those of you who complain about SomeGuy are IDIOTS! He is expressing his opinion, something you should do. While I don’t agree with everything he says (personally I LOVED Diablo II) I think that he is VERY passionate about what he believes in.

    After reading all that, I wanted to go bust out my old Diablo disc, get back on with my Warrior, and pwn some Diablo face!

    I remember when I played the first one, I felt like a sword-wielding god! The story revolved around me, I was IMPORTANT! I killed the Butcher, the Skeleton King, and many others! INCLUDING DIABLO! All of that, singlehandedly. In number 2, I felt worthless. The game wasn’t about me at all, it was all about the Dark Wanderer, which I can see being important, but, come on, I want to be important too!

    I think that Some Guy is also right about the way the skills are gained in number 2. If you really think about it, where does your person learn to summon a hydra out of the ground. I feel like that’s something you would read about, or learn from some grandmaster, which is something I’d like to see in D3.

    And also, the restricting of the weapons to certain classes. Why, exactly, can’t ANYONE hold a shrunken head, and bash someone with it? Is that really all that complicated? Sure, they don’t get the bonus, but that’s THEIR choice. If they’d rather run around, swinging two Wolverine-esque claws as a sorceress, let them. And if I want to have my paladin to beat down Diablo with a stick with an orb on the end, just because I can, why can’t he?

    If you people don’t agree with him, state that fact and give reasons why. I loved the terraining in Diablo 2, it lacked the frightening ability to make me pee my pants when my parents walked in behind me to see what I was doing, but it was done well. And I liked the storyline, I just wish I was a bigger deal. Not just one of the THOUSANDS of other adventurers who can slay Diablo with a hand behind their back, or 1 spell they focused on completely. I’ve done that with Teeth. Couldn’t touch me.

    Another promblem is that, as many before me have stated, that I’m FASTER than the catwoman. I can blow them away with my OP teeth, and if they get close, AWAAAAAAY!

    All in all, I think Diablo 3 will be great, especially from the screen shots I’ve seen. It looks like it will be very frightening. Not as scary as Diablo, but scary nonetheless. I applaud Some Guy, and I hope he is still reading these, but I doubt it. I think that he’s hoping, maybe someone from the D3 team will read this, decide that he was right on a few points, and decide to edit the game that way. Maybe the rest of you should be that passionate. If you disagree with him SO much, maybe they’ll listen to you o0ver this one guy.

  181. 181 HolyCow Jun 6th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Wow! This thread has been continuing relentlessly for 3 years! People have been waiting for this for 3 years? Lol I would have expected that anticipation would have turned into frustration by now!

  182. 182 ScuttleButt Jul 8th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    †hey.. whats wrong with you???

  183. 183 Goi Jul 14th, 2009 at 1:33 am

    At the en of the day, i remember waiting for d3 for like the past 5-6 years itd be nice if the game was darker and abit more low budget gore ish, and at the end of the day why are ppl worrying bowt classes, they will keep a range char, and a pure magic, so they wont look the same or have the same name but if u look between th lines they will be jus bout the same! And with all current hype of pirates it wudnt surprise me one bit if the good all rounder was a pirate, and well d1 was bloody scary but we wer so much younger when we 1st play it, i last playd it not loong ago and fort, ya kno wa, its not that bad jus dark and bloody, which yeah it is ment to be, but i will not moan bowt a more colourful game, blizz are lookin to mint their own asses so they will do what they have to jus to get the game played by every other gamer out there! And the youth are “the way forward” so expect colour and a bit less guts, but oh well, you shud quit bitchin am hope the game manages to give what it say in tying up the loose ends left from the last and that the storey is grappling it will be a playable game that will stop us all replaying and draing the life out of every other game on any console, at the end of it, all games have gone bright and cartoony, all games are not what they use to be, have fun

  184. 184 STEVE Aug 4th, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    I HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THE RELEASE OF DIABLO THREE FOR ABOUT 7 YRS. I first play diablo when i was 15 and now i am older i got hair on my face a wife and a kid on the way. I am still waiting for the release of diablo 3 hopefully one day they will make the dame game. Or maybe they will release it when i die who knows. PLAY ON GAMERS! PLAY ON! I SALUTE YOU!

  185. 185 Comeond3 Aug 9th, 2009 at 7:50 am

    Diablo 3 is announced 9/9/9 and will be published then.

  186. 186 SoulStealer Aug 22nd, 2009 at 10:32 am

    Diablo 3 — I wonder what the bosses are going to be in D3. I know so far that the Characters are Monk, Witch Doctor, Barbarian, and Wizard. But i want to know what the Bosses are. According to alot of rumors D3 should be out 12/24/09 or latest early 2010

  187. 187 get real ppl Nov 3rd, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    Some Guy you are absolutely right for sure Diablo 1 was better and the books skills system is better then trees.
    And the multiplayer in diablo2 is all about rushing and runs no one want to play they want to hit level 90 in 3 days, where is the fun in that it’s just boring.

  188. 188 Diablo Fan Dec 19th, 2009 at 10:11 am

    This game is so cool:)

  189. 189 charlie Dec 29th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    I didnt play diablo 1 very much but played diablo 2 for years and got so addicted to it. When you can get addicted to a game you know its good. I think 3 is going to be very good. I like that ones guys idea about bein aboe to kinda create your own character as far as adding lil things to make him stand out. I guess how they do in the new warcraft? world of warcraft i think. Its gonna be awesome tho! Excited!

  190. 190 Older d2 play Jan 5th, 2010 at 11:51 am

    ok diablo was a good game and it was scary and difficult no dought. but the only reason you can have the term “runs” in a game is by there not being an endless difficulty. concider this… you can have 8 people in one game if they are all maxed out of course they will be albe to reck baal no problem. the thing that got me mad about d2 was the rune words. it allows people to play through the game bythemselves easily. Enigma+hoto= no problem beating the game no matter the class. now if they brough in some cool crafts or new items with increased difficulty to even the game that would be awesome. the new patch also has a higher high rune drop rate. that just makes things rediculus

  191. 191 ye Feb 21st, 2010 at 10:20 am

    Yeah I never thought it would come out 2011 i was hoping 2008 at most

    but its really looking bad…

  192. 192 Tanner Allgood Feb 25th, 2010 at 12:40 am

    omg this is taking too long but its getting closer i just wanna know what the fith class is going to be if their gonna bring back the palidin or the necromancer or the druid or maybe even add in some kind of new class but so far there is no healer so maybe thats what is gonna come out next idk but they just need to get it out their NOW if they tell me who the fith class is i will be happy and i can wait another year or two LOL not really…… rrrrrr

  193. 193 some kid Mar 12th, 2010 at 7:49 pm

    I think diablo is better becuase all the same reasons some guy said

    i think it is all boring doing everything alot of times just to lvl up and get to bosses lvls. I mean i like fighting baal and all of them but thats about it. all of the others they should make them more exp and alot harder. i would think that people would agree with him but some of u say that he is stupid just becuase of long post. guys thats like a highschool or collage paper length probably more. dont judge him.

  194. 194 Kevin AKA Nivek Mar 27th, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    Diablo 3 ?

  195. 195 Some guy 1000 Apr 12th, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    I read a lot of comments of you guys and i like all your ideas. I personally think that diablo is an online game only, i never hade so much un than seeing the character i created and boosted up owned other characters with real persons behind them.(hope d3 online is free) I would also like D3 to have new kind of environments cuz d2 5 towns kind a suck. The towns could be a lot bigger like a real town with a lot of buildings and a market place and you know you’d feel like the hero of a huge city with walls and guards and ,i mean, a life in the city like ur not the center of interest. They should alse put food stations and like 5 competitive sellers of weapons to feel the living of the city.(english is not my first language)

    Secondly, i think that in d3, we should be able to ride horses or birds like in wow and buy our own rides like they are our own property and ya another thing, i think every player could buy his own home in the d3 towns like to have the choices between like 50 houses so that everybody could store their items or rides in their homes. Blizzard should also put an arena like in wow in every big town so that u and ur friends could figth with other teams and have mini-tournements on precise dates.

    I just checked d3 newest updates and i saw that the gear is more diversified and this is one thing i like. shoulder pads, knee pads. Thats cool.

    I think it would be cool that d3 become massively multiplayer and that a big part of the game is based on the multiplayer game. I also hope they had more than the already existing 4 classes. D3 is a must for me to buy …
    Respond to my comment plz.

  196. 196 yudi Jun 26th, 2010 at 11:53 am

    I MISS TO PLAY DIABLO AGAIN…..

  197. 197 art Oct 5th, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    it was just a game man….and it wasnt a mmo! u could have 12 peaple to a room a mmo is like 15000-150000 so i say to you….good day sir!

  198. 198 Killswitch Oct 27th, 2010 at 10:06 am

    Guy, i couldn’t have put it better myslef.
    In all honesty, I own Diablo 1-LOD. Im anxious as hell for 3 to come out… been waiting for years!

    I never got the opprotunity to finish Diablo 1, although your posts extremely encouraged me to go back and play.
    I DO disagree on one point you had about Diablo 2/LOD being an MMORPG and it being too easy because you have 7 other ppl in the game helping you clear the area. If you continue playing Diablo2/LOD as you did Diablo 1 (SINGLE PLAYER) you’ll run into the same form of problems you had in the first one. Not to say that its as challenging, because again, in Diablo 2/LOD, you have the option to run. And as a high lvl char, you never run out of stamina.
    But then again, Blizzard Ent. also made more characters stronger, such as fire resistant, magic resistant, etc.
    Back to what I was saying, if you play through the game in single player, or even just set a password to your game, youll understand the significance of the difficulty as you progress through the game.
    Your lvl 90 Sorc will still have trouble in HELL because a lot of chars in act 5 are cold immune/resistant.

    Thats the only arguement I have against your posts. Other than that, you hit the idealism that I also had right on the bulls-eye.

    As far as gender goes, I beleive i saw an article somewhere online that Blizzard threw in a Hunter, instead of an Amazon… So the idea of Metal Bikinis would also encourage ppl to try multiple classes instead of studying how to merc everything with just a Barbarian.

    Just a thought. :)

  199. 199 Killswitch Oct 27th, 2010 at 10:13 am

    Another thought that just came to mind….
    D4……
    Making a D4 might throw the story a bit far overboard,
    but an idea for it would be,
    Take WOW for instance. Maybe you could also play as one of the evil characters?
    I don’t mean a Necromancer, I mean an undead character, or one of the demons you see running around in the deeper pits of hell.

    I don’t wanna turn the game into another “pitty me, find me 20 chicken eggs” questing game, but more of a 2 sided fight for the right to claim the world of the afterlife?

    respond at your own free will, and thnx for your input!

  200. 200 Engage Apr 30th, 2011 at 7:15 pm

    4-30-11 still not out yet WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  201. 201 Slipknot Jun 22nd, 2011 at 11:52 pm

    Killswitch, Completely agree with you. Even though I didn’t play Diablo1, Diablo 2 is still the best game I have ever played. Forget petty quests that send you in circles for hours for little reward. Send me to kill things that explode in furious blood! Gawd!!! Why cant other games see that we hate stupid quests?

    Also, something I expect from Blizzard is a truly awesome skill tree

  202. 202 diablo 3 trial Sep 14th, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    Valuable info. Fortunate me I found your site unintentionally, and I am shocked why this coincidence did not came about in advance! I bookmarked it.

  203. 203 dunb some guy Jun 30th, 2012 at 4:54 pm

    you dont even konw what your talking about

  204. 204 dunb some guy Jun 30th, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    your so dumb someguy

  205. 205 Mousevich Jul 11th, 2012 at 10:39 pm

    get out from under the bridge!

  206. 206 diablo 3 speed guide Aug 5th, 2012 at 11:28 am

    Interesting post. Does anyone feel like Diablo3 is losing it’s player base? I think it is slowly dropping down atleast the rate of Auction House items.

  1. 1 Diablo 3 statue | Diablo 2 Store Pingback on Sep 4th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
  2. 2 Game Zone » Diablo 3 statue Pingback on Sep 17th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
  3. 3 Barbarian fighting | Daily Diablo Pingback on Oct 22nd, 2008 at 12:20 am
  4. 4 Diablo 3 Multiplayer | Daily Diablo Pingback on Oct 27th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
  5. 5 BlizzCast: Diablo 3 artwork | Daily Diablo Pingback on Nov 22nd, 2008 at 3:49 pm
  6. 6 Diablo 3 screenshots « Diablo 3 Pingback on Feb 12th, 2009 at 7:15 am
  7. 7 Diablo Watch: Diablo 3 new art at MaxFreak Diablo Pingback on Jun 24th, 2009 at 12:10 am
  8. 8 Diablo 3 fourth class | Diablo 3 Pingback on Jul 11th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
  9. 9 Diablo 3 screenshots | Diablo 3 Pingback on Jul 12th, 2009 at 4:34 am
  10. 10 Diablo 3 character customization | Diablo 3 Pingback on Aug 3rd, 2010 at 7:26 am
  11. 11 New Diablo 3 class – Demon Hunter | Diablo3Now.com Pingback on Oct 28th, 2010 at 3:21 am
  12. 12 Diablo 3 characters level cap? 60! | Diablo3Now.com Pingback on Oct 28th, 2010 at 6:31 am
  13. 13 Diablo 3 main stats change Pingback on Feb 12th, 2011 at 12:10 pm
  14. 14 Diablo 3 statue Pingback on Feb 12th, 2011 at 12:13 pm
  15. 15 Barbarian fighting Pingback on Mar 17th, 2011 at 6:01 am
  16. 16 Diablo 3 beta video leaked Pingback on Sep 3rd, 2011 at 4:01 am
  17. 17 Diablo 3 hero customization | Allnewsyouneed.com Pingback on Sep 5th, 2011 at 3:11 pm
  18. 18 Diablo 3 beta video (streaming) Pingback on Sep 7th, 2011 at 6:21 am
  19. 19 Diablo 3 Multiplayer Pingback on May 15th, 2012 at 4:38 pm
Comments are currently closed.

Get Diablo 3 guest pass!

Note: Your guest pass gives you 30 days of free Diablo 3 play!


  

Get Diablo News

Enter your email address:




Subscribe via RSS

Vote on the Diablo 3 Top 200
Diablo 3 Top 200 - Diablo 3 Items, Gold, Maps, Quests, Guilds, Guides, Hacks, Cheats

BlogRanks

BlogRankers.com game, diablo, blizzard, diablo 3, release date, characters, beta game, diablo, blizzard, diablo 3, release date, characters, beta